Lord Nimmo Smith's Verdict on Dual Contracts

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
So, is that it over ...can we now move on from dual contracts and title stripping?
 
So, they're guilty but it's a measly fine. A decade of cheating and **** all comes of it.

<grr> BEELIN!

RIGHT. LET'S AW MARCH ON HAMPDEN
 
"Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions of the SPL Rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements," it states.

"Nor did the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligible to play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should be imposed upon Rangers FC."
Click to expand...

<laugh>.
 
RebelBhoy said:
Yup. That statement confirms they are dead and they cheated.

SPL are pussies though. Confirmed cheats get no punishment.

**** it, lets play 12 players for the next 10 years.
Click to expand...

...or the regulation infractions (whatever they are, hivny read the commission findings) were deemed to be punishable by a fine.

...or Nimmo is corrupt and was instructed to do a coverup/whitewash.

Take yer pick.
 
As noted in the Commission's earlier decision made on 12 September 2012 there is no allegation that the current owner and operator of the club, The Rangers Football Club Limited ("Newco"), contravened the SPL Rules or could be held responsible for any breach by Oldco
Click to expand...
;

Same club, different owner/operators clearly stated by Lord Nimmo Smith.

Does this part of the statement have any effect on the current transfer embargo?
 
Why are the Huns so happy with this decision ?? Chasing Scotland most sucessful run club they killed themselves,even the spl admit that by fining oldco . Rangers are dead lets move on .Looking forward to seeing some real Zombies on the motorway on Saturday , both teams have a lunch time kick off , 3 miles apart , could be interesting .
 
MrT said:
;

Same club, different owner/operators clearly stated by Lord Nimmo Smith.

Does this part of the statement have any effect on the current transfer embargo?
Click to expand...

Widny think so. That was punishment for going into admin as per the regulations.
 
harryhood67 said:
Why are the Huns so happy with this decision ?? Chasing Scotland most sucessful run club they killed themselves,even the spl admit that by fining oldco . Rangers are dead lets move on .Looking forward to seeing some real Zombies on the motorway on Saturday , both teams have a lunch time kick off , 3 miles apart , could be interesting .
Click to expand...

You've been calling us cheats for ****ing ages auld yin.

no cheating went on <laugh>

54 and coutning
 
Administration was Oldco business. Newco havent been in administration. Newco haven't brought the game into disrepute.

Nimmo Smith has differentiated between them clearly on behalf of the SFA in this case so I don't see why the SFA can't differentiate between them in the transfer ruling.
 
Gambol said:
MrT said:
;

Same club, different owner/operators clearly stated by Lord Nimmo Smith.

Does this part of the statement have any effect on the current transfer embargo?
Click to expand...

Widny think so. That was punishment for going into admin as per the regulations.
Click to expand...

No it wasn't. It was the cost of transferring the licence from the now defunct club.

It was the intended punishment for the old club before they were liquidated for cheating in their last year of existence.
 
MrT said:
Administration was Oldco business. Newco havent been in administration. Newco haven't brought the game into disrepute.

Nimmo Smith has differentiated between them clearly on behalf of the SFA in this case so I don't see why the SFA can't differentiate between them in the transfer ruling.
Click to expand...

It is absolutely right and proper that the new club is not punished. I don't think anyone would want that.
 
rogueleader said:
"... todays the day the teddy bears get their baws kicked " :emoticon-0159-music


Or is it ? Who knows ? It should be funny one way or the other.

One thing I do know is that if they are found not guilty there will be a certain ugg boot wearing dodgy car selling Take That loving part-time dj on here at precisely 12.03pm.
Click to expand...

<laugh><laugh><laugh><ok>.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back