*****phile's 0 Juventus 3

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Rocket said:
I'd probably go along with this.

You can't defend like that at this level.

But I just wish Celtic and the majority of their fans would accept defeat with a bit of grace for once instead of looking for someone to blame.
Click to expand...

Don't you think that "Celtic played them off the park (squeaky voice)"?
 
Rocket said:
I'd probably go along with this.

You can't defend like that at this level.

But I just wish Celtic and the majority of their fans would accept defeat with a bit of grace for once instead of looking for someone to blame.
Click to expand...

I said it on the Sellick board ... Lennon went far to atatck minded ... especially against an Italian team!!
 
pud said:
I said it on the Sellick board ... Lennon went far to atatck minded ... especially against an Italian team!!
Click to expand...

Don't think that was the plan from the outset, though.

Losing a goal in 3 mins forces your hand - Forrest was through the middle to get pace going at Pirlo - Juve have loads of pace out wide but he put the wee man up the centre cos he thought we'd get something out of it.

A Centre Half in midfield, one striker, and a winger through the middle isn't too offensive at all if you ask me.

If you lose an early goal, though, you need to push that attacking midfielder and your wide players on a bit.
 
Biggus Diccus said:
Don't think that was the plan from the outset, though.

Losing a goal in 3 mins forces your hand - Forrest was through the middle to get pace going at Pirlo - Juve have loads of pace out wide but he put the wee man up the centre cos he thought we'd get something out of it.

A Centre Half in midfield, one striker, and a winger through the middle isn't too offensive at all if you ask me.

If you lose an early goal, though, you need to push that attacking midfielder and your wide players on a bit.
Click to expand...


True but it was niave to go chasing so early on...

No need to have Forrest on (he wasn't fit)... just have Commons supporting Hooper and why the **** was Ledley (Celtic's best midfielder) not playing!!!

Anyways! <ale>
 
Rocket said:
Celtic never played them off the park at any time.

But I agree with Pud, I don't think there was ever three goals in it.
Click to expand...

Cheers

You must log in or register to see images
 
Chapmeister... said:
you're a desperate fool.

half watched, is in laptop on lap, football on telly. if something interesting happens, look up. If they show a replay of something i might have missed the first time, look up.

If our opinions mean nothing then why are you here trying to convince us we're wrong?:smiley-finger007:
Click to expand...

I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything, I simply said I don't care what you think if you watched "Half the game" with your blinkers on.
 
DevAdvocate said:
I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything, I simply said I don't care what you think if you watched "Half the game" with your blinkers on.
Click to expand...

i "half watched" the game whilst sitting on a very broad fence, you just don't like my opinion so you call me biased etc, if a celtic fan said that hooper was acting a dick too and commons was going to downway to easy & it was sloppy defending that caused the loss would you call him blinkered? *dev head on* yes or no question.
 
Chapmeister... said:
i "half watched" the game whilst sitting on a very broad fence, you just don't like my opinion so you call me biased etc, if a celtic fan said that hooper was acting a dick too and commons was going to downway to easy & it was sloppy defending that caused the loss would you call him blinkered? *dev head on* yes or no question.
Click to expand...

As I said at the time you showed you bias in huge bold letters, you and the rest of your board mates. Here's a reminder what you said:

Chapmeister... said:
**** me is this still going on? end of the day what was hoopers intentions? he was trying to put off or obstruct the goalkeeper which is unsporting etc but also not illegal.

perhaps juventus should do a counter and question why commons wasn't send off for being a cheating diving ****?

did the penalty box handbags affect the fact that the two juventus goals came from cutting up your defence?

Celtic: Always cheated never defeated...

i'd imagine they'd be up in arms if this had happened to rangers and wouldn't mock, antagonise or whatever it is they think they do here.
Click to expand...

Very neutral of you I must say, you are certainly not just pointing the finger of blame at Celtic players...oh wait.


Unreal.
 
Chapmeister... said:
i "half watched" the game whilst sitting on a very broad fence, you just don't like my opinion so you call me biased etc, if a celtic fan said that hooper was acting a dick too and commons was going to downway to easy & it was sloppy defending that caused the loss would you call him blinkered? *dev head on* yes or no question.
Click to expand...

**dev head** yes or no answer.

DevAdvocate said:
As I said at the time you showed you bias in huge bold letters, you and the rest of your board mates. Here's a reminder what you said:



Very neutral of you I must say, you are certainly not just pointing the finger of blame at Celtic players...oh wait.


Unreal.
Click to expand...

Can't see no "huge bold letters" Dev fail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back