Ipswich Town's former Chief Executive Simon Clegg is leading a campaign to have the ban on drinking in sight of the pitch at games removed.
He claims that clubs should be allowed to decide when it's appropriate and when it isn't.
âSociety has moved on since the dark days of the 1970s and 1980s and home office figures would suggest that the number of arrests at games over the last couple of seasons is at an all-time low.
âThat doesnât mean Iâm being complacent about this situation and what Iâm not calling for is a complete lifting of the ban.
âWhat I am suggesting is this issue should be delegated down to the local area for them to make a decision on a case by case basis. So if we were playing Norwich you probably wouldnât do it but we probably would do it if we were playing Bristol City.â
He says that there should be family areas where it's not allowed (Paxton?) and that it should be trialed at Portman Road, due to the club's good record.
I'm taking his word for that and assuming that he's talking about hooliganism and violent or anti-social behaviour.
He also claims that it's unfair to target one sport, pointing out that Reading fans can't drink in their seats but London Irish fans can, despite them being the same seats!
What do people make of this? I have mixed feelings, as I'd like to be allowed to drink and some of our games bloody drive me to it, but I can also see it going badly wrong.
The suggestion that some games would be ok but others wouldn't is sensible, but when clubs have the potential to make a ton of extra money, then I can see them making poor choices.
I'm currently undecided, but leaning towards maintaining the ban, I think.
He claims that clubs should be allowed to decide when it's appropriate and when it isn't.
âSociety has moved on since the dark days of the 1970s and 1980s and home office figures would suggest that the number of arrests at games over the last couple of seasons is at an all-time low.
âThat doesnât mean Iâm being complacent about this situation and what Iâm not calling for is a complete lifting of the ban.
âWhat I am suggesting is this issue should be delegated down to the local area for them to make a decision on a case by case basis. So if we were playing Norwich you probably wouldnât do it but we probably would do it if we were playing Bristol City.â
He says that there should be family areas where it's not allowed (Paxton?) and that it should be trialed at Portman Road, due to the club's good record.
I'm taking his word for that and assuming that he's talking about hooliganism and violent or anti-social behaviour.
He also claims that it's unfair to target one sport, pointing out that Reading fans can't drink in their seats but London Irish fans can, despite them being the same seats!
What do people make of this? I have mixed feelings, as I'd like to be allowed to drink and some of our games bloody drive me to it, but I can also see it going badly wrong.
The suggestion that some games would be ok but others wouldn't is sensible, but when clubs have the potential to make a ton of extra money, then I can see them making poor choices.
I'm currently undecided, but leaning towards maintaining the ban, I think.


