Jim Traynor's Statement = Superb

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
pud said:
Day 1: Rangers - We do not need to comment on this. It's a trivial matter.

DAY 2: Rangers - Full page beelathon detaling why it's a trivial matter.

Thank **** Celtic don't employ an ex "journalist" to speak on their behalf!


Are you not genuinely embarrased by Traynor?
Click to expand...

Day 1. Don't need to comment on the matter.

Day 2. Top story on BBC News has BBC Scotland (enemies) saying we're being wound up.

The enemies trying to do a bit of muck raking and big Jim comes out and sets the record straight.

Fantastic statement.
 
Medro said:
Day 1. Don't need to comment on the matter.

Day 2. Top story on BBC News has BBC Scotland (enemies) saying we're being wound up.

The enemies trying to do a bit of muck raking and big Jim comes out and sets the record straight.

Fantastic statement.
Click to expand...

You're mentally ill.
 
Medro said:
Day 1. Don't need to comment on the matter.

Day 2. Top story on BBC News has BBC Scotland (enemies) saying we're being wound up.

The enemies trying to do a bit of muck raking and big Jim comes out and sets the record straight.

Fantastic statement.
Click to expand...

I suppose this is his job, to pander to the yahoos who will love his statements!
 
pud said:
Day 1: Rangers - We do not need to comment on this. It's a trivial matter.

DAY 2: Rangers - Full page beelathon detaling why it's a trivial matter.

Thank **** Celtic don't employ an ex "journalist" to speak on their behalf!


Are you not genuinely embarrased by Traynor?
Click to expand...

I agree with you. They should have put out the statement when the "story" broke.

But it seemed they viewed it as nonsense and only made a statement to that effect because the "story" grew.

Should have nipped it in the bud.

In the end there is **** all to see here. Move along timmy, move along. <laugh>
 
Gambol said:
I agree with you. They should have put out the statement when the "story" broke.

But it seemed they viewed it as nonsense and only made a statement to that effect because the "story" grew.

Should have nipped it in the bud.

In the end there is **** all to see here. Move along timmy, move along.
Click to expand...

I think that woudl have made sense but Traynor's just a more sane (just) version of Leggat!


On a side note ... I have just found out I have second cousins (my mum's cousin???) called Leggat!! <eek>
 
pud said:
I think that woudl have made sense but Traynor's just a more sane (just) version of Leggat!


On a side note ... I have just found out I have second cousins (my mum's cousin???) called Leggat!! <eek>
Click to expand...

Undercover brother = related to Leggat.

Yessssssssss.

The tims will calling for your head again
 
pud said:
I think that woudl have made sense but Traynor's just a more sane (just) version of Leggat!


On a side note ... I have just found out I have second cousins (my mum's cousin???) called Leggat!! <eek>
Click to expand...

Couldny give a **** about Traynor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back