1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

our squad

Discussion in 'Celtic' started by ronaldraygun, May 14, 2011.

  1. ronaldraygun

    ronaldraygun New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    celtic have a HUGE squad. However we have LOADS of players who arent going to impact the first team. So why dont we punt people who arent going to make an impact ( Mcginn, Murphy etc) and bring in fewer players who would actually challenge for a place in the squad. For example Murphy is never going to keep stoes or hooper out of the team and often it is the for Sammy, so why not punt them and bring in a target man who may actually fight for a spot.

    This would reduce wages and bring in more quality and less passengers. It would mean slightly smaller squad but i really do think we need to get rid of some players who, lets face it, will never make an impact.

    So what do you think? :smile:
     
    #1
  2. ronaldraygun

    ronaldraygun New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    this does not just apply to strikers but all over the feild
     
    #2
  3. Admiral Pure

    Admiral Pure Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    90
    We do have a big squad but we've needed it. Who'd've thought we needed 25 (or however many it is <laugh>) midfielders? Well with Kayal, Ledley and Commons out tomorrow it's just as well we have plenty of depth. But I agree we could prune here and there.
     
    #3
  4. anportmorbhoy

    anportmorbhoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,381
    Likes Received:
    77
    We have a fairly decent core of first team players now so unlike last summer I feel this year we can spend our budget on 1 or 2 top players rather than 8 or 9 like last year. They can then push a first teamer from this season to be cover meaning we can get rid ofnThose who won't make it. Mcginn odea Hutchinson etc can go
     
    #4
  5. Admiral Pure

    Admiral Pure Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    90
    We've got Wilson coming in already, so I'd guess O'Dea will be away permanently. I don't see Murphy pushing for a regular spot. And I agree about McGinn, he's too far down the pecking order now.
     
    #5
  6. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Out: O'Dea, Thompson, Loovens, Ljungberg, McGinn, Murphy and Rasmussen.

    In: Wilson to come, a decent target man who also contributes a few goals. I suspect Forster will go back to Newcastle so we'll need a new goalie too.

    We've also signed Matthews on a pre-contract from Cardiff and he is meant to be a talented defender.

    I would also like to see the Greek donkey sold if a decent bid came in for him.
     
    #6
  7. Admiral Pure

    Admiral Pure Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    90
    And Rasmussen will surely be gone. I forgot about him. <laugh>

    Edit: And Hinkel. Shame, I always rated him highly.
     
    #7
  8. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Hooiveld too. If he was half as good as he told us he as, he'd be some player.

    i think the stated aim is to reduce the squad by letting go of some of the 19's in the first instance. Cutting down the numbers that will be kept on. Harsh, but sensible.
     
    #8
  9. Thomas The Cat

    Thomas The Cat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    233
    If you prone to the bare bones you end up having to use players that don't cut the mustard. <laugh> I could be a pundit with **** patter like that.
     
    #9
  10. Null

    Null Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    34,179
    Likes Received:
    9,757
    If possible:

    Get rid off:

    Foster/Hinkle (he's out of contract)/Loovens/Hoodvield/O'Dea/Jaurez/Ljunberg/McGinn/Maloney/Murphy

    Do Celtic give Rasmussen a pre-season to see what he can do?

    Would be good to see if Thompson comes back from loan "improved" - I like him as a player and see potential.

    New:

    Goalkeeper of Boruc standard
    Centre Back
    Goal Scoring Midfielder
    Creative Midfielder
    Striker
     
    #10

  11. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    IF Wigan go down I'd like to see us try and lure McCarthy back to Scotland. Don't know if we could afford it though.
     
    #11
  12. Admiral Pure

    Admiral Pure Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    90
    A fine mixed metaphor <laugh>

    Anyway, I see your point but the squad is massive. For example, we could lose Hooiveld, O'Dea and Thompson and still have five centrebacks (Maj, Rogne, Mulgrew, Loovens and yer man coming in from Forest). We actually have scope to be quite brutal in getting players off the wage list without seriously damaging the quality and depth of the squad.
     
    #12
  13. anportmorbhoy

    anportmorbhoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,381
    Likes Received:
    77
    We'd never get him

    Some decent EPL clubs were sniffing earlier in the year so way too pricey now

    Should have taken him when he was at Hamilton. Was always going to go onto bigger and better things. Should have been us making the profit on him and not Wigan!!!
     
    #13
  14. Mick

    Mick Probably won't answer PMs
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,325
    Likes Received:
    926
    We got the highest points score we've had in 7 seasons, let's not over react. Do what we did this season again next year and we will win the league. It's Rangers who need to make changes and 'gel' while we've finally found our best 11.
     
    #14
  15. EDGE

    EDGE Guest

    Hi Mick
     
    #15
  16. Girvan Loyal 1690

    Girvan Loyal 1690 Nobody's safe now

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    40,526
    Likes Received:
    17,744
    how much did you win on supa hupa then mick?
     
    #16
  17. Admiral Pure

    Admiral Pure Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    90
    I don't think anyone's overreacting Mick. We've had a bunch of players out on loan plus quite a few in the squad who haven't had a look in all season (all the names mentioned above). It's unlikely that any will be so improved as to be pushing for places next season so it's in everyone's interests that they move on. If we free up some wages, get the odd quid in transfer fees we can bring in a couple of new faces to strengthen the squad further. I agree we have the basis for a decent team and we don't need too much tinkering with the first 11, but there's always room for improvement.
     
    #17
  18. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    That was that dick Mowbray's fault. He was only interested in signing players "that were ready to walk straight into the first team."

    Prick.
     
    #18

Share This Page