Charlie Green playing a blinder

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
So you did not go onto the Liverpool Rep thread to ask for Rep?


Why do you care either way? It's simple (like you appear to be), you have jumped on the bandwagon because it's in your nature. This had NOTHING to do with you yet you have spent the last two days accusing me of being furious.

Jesus Christ <doh>

I want to talk about Rangers, not about you ****in yappin away like an old woman, accusing people of being "rep whores". I have rarely been on here over the past few days but when I have you've been gurning about the same issue. When lookin at the posts you're even on here at night going on about the same issue.

And it has EVERYTHING to do with me, when it's on my glorious threads.

Let it go Dev. Let it go.
 
no it doesn't. Why don't you prove me wrong? after all it is your hobby

The point I am making (and have made all along) is that you blithely accuse people (Me included)of being obsessed about Rangers (on a daily basis) and the truth of the matter is that you and Edge are obsessed about Positive Rep.

If I posted the links to your posts on the Liverpool Rep thread you will argue that you did not ask for Rep, it's pretty obvious the road of argument you intend to take because you are nothing if not predicatable.

The fact of the matter is that the Rep thread serves no other purpose than Rep for it's contributors, you will try (and fail) to say that you never actually "asked", "begged" or "Hoored" for Rep, but by your very actions on posting on that thread you have done exactly that <ok>

Far from being beeling, i'm pissing myself laughing at the evasion you have displayed, and at the Pack Rats who have tried to back you up by ignoring the importance you seem to place in your Rep score.
 
Jesus Christ

I want to talk about Rangers, not about you ****in yappin away like an old woman, accusing people of being "rep whores". I have rarely been on here over the past few days but when I have you've been gurning about the same issue. When lookin at the posts you're even on here at night going on about the same issue.

And it has EVERYTHING to do with me, when it's on my glorious threads.

Let it go Dev. Let it go.

Why do you care?

I don't care what you think so why do you care what I think?

Don't bother answering, it was a rhetorical question <ok>



No I really don't have to do anything for you dev.

As usual then?

I thought so.
 
The point I am making (and have made all along) is that you blithely accuse people (Me included)of being obsessed about Rangers (on a daily basis) and the truth of the matter is that you and Edge are obsessed about Positive Rep.

If I posted the links to your posts on the Liverpool Rep thread you will argue that you did not ask for Rep, it's pretty obvious the road of argument you intend to take because you are nothing if not predicatable.

The fact of the matter is that the Rep thread serves no other purpose than Rep for it's contributors, you will try (and fail) to say that you never actually "asked", "begged" or "Hoored" for Rep, but by your very actions on posting on that thread you have done exactly that <ok>

Far from being beeling, i'm pissing myself laughing at the evasion you have displayed, and at the Pack Rats who have tried to back you up by ignoring the importance you seem to place in your Rep score.

You must log in or register to see images
 
The point I am making (and have made all along) is that you blithely accuse people (Me included)of being obsessed about Rangers (on a daily basis) and the truth of the matter is that you and Edge are obsessed about Positive Rep.

If I posted the links to your posts on the Liverpool Rep thread you will argue that you did not ask for Rep, it's pretty obvious the road of argument you intend to take because you are nothing if not predicatable.

The fact of the matter is that the Rep thread serves no other purpose than Rep for it's contributors, you will try (and fail) to say that you never actually "asked", "begged" or "Hoored" for Rep, but by your very actions on posting on that thread you have done exactly that <ok>

Far from being beeling, i'm pissing myself laughing at the evasion you have displayed, and at the Pack Rats who have tried to back you up by ignoring the importance you seem to place in your Rep score.

You are the only one being evasive.

You have claimed nev has been begging for rep.
Nev has said he hasn't, and invited you to show posts where he has begged for rep.
You are now saying that he hasn't begged for rep, but he was indirectly begging for it by posting on a thread....on a forum.

Just a heads up, posting on threads is the norm on internet forums.
 
You are the only one being evasive.

You have claimed nev has been begging for rep.
Nev has said he hasn't, and invited you to show posts where he has begged for rep.
You are now saying that he hasn't begged for rep, but he was indirectly begging for it by posting on a thread....on a forum.

Just a heads up, posting on threads is the norm on internet forums.

Same question as I asked Medro, what's it got to do with you?
 
I would still love to know why Neville and Barrie neg repped the same post days after it was posted.

It's one thing repping current posts but for both of them to go looking for the same days-old posts is a bit creepy.