Will Prossie ever score again? Official thread!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Well you all took a bite didn't you? If you wasn't fooled, why such hostility in the first few responses? <doh>

You were all quick to rush out of the box and retaliate. The logical thing to do would be to laugh it off, but what can I say, I like fishing... <whistle>

I was laughing at how innaccurate the post was and the fact you were desperate to get one over on us.

But seeing as you've failed to do that I suppose you can just say 'oh it was a wind-up and I got you all'. Reality check needed. Everyone still thinks you're an idiot <ok>

Tip: If you want to wind us up properly, use originality and wit. At least entertain us rather than insult us with stupidity <ok> <cheers>
 
As we said Waggy goals and performances under Nigel speak for themselves

We dont need to defend him

Prossie on the other hand <whistle>
As somebody has previously stated, I never slated Waggy in terms of performance, just this Season's goal:game record. And Proschwitz hasn't exactly played bad... He started one game and it was alongside McLean, away at Middlesbrough which is just a recipe for disaster... <doh>

When he's come on, he's looked sharp and up for it. We've all been crying out for him to start a match, especially now Aluko is injured. However, that's not going to happen when the current set-up has won 3 games on the bounce. Why fix something that isn't broken?

He'll hopefully start the Cup Match vs L'Orient in January.

Andy King's Crown Jewels said:
I was laughing at how innaccurate the post was and the fact you were desperate to get one over on us.

But seeing as you've failed to do that I suppose you can just say 'oh it was a wind-up and I got you all'. Reality check needed. Everyone still thinks you're an idiot <ok>

Tip: If you want to wind us up properly, use originality and wit. At least entertain us rather than insult us with stupidity<ok><cheers>

And you're still biting... <whistle>

Yes, it was a pretty piss-poor way to try and turn that ridiculous and pointless thread about Proschwitz against you, and that's why it should have been a lot more obvious to you that it wasn't serious.

If I actually wanted to get one over on you, I'd do some more research and post something worth debating.

If this thread was serious, I'd admit I failed, but what's funnier, is that you actually thought it was serious and you've actually made yourself look a idiot for retaliating to such a degree.
 
Again who's crying about it, 1 or 2, its a forum, this is what there about. Proud Fox was on the Hull board today and nobody was basically telling him to stick to his own board. Im sure some of your threads do get spoilt by Hull fans but like you say this thread was created to have alaugh at us so 1 or 2 are gonna rise to the bate. Im simply here to talk to other fans, its healthy competition although i don't really understand some of the name calling and bitching that goes on.
In all fairness, about 111 of your 126 posts I think are on this Forum <laugh>

Danger Fox said:
I went on the Hull board not long ago and was abused by quite a few for being there and told to go back to my own board and I didn't go there to take the piss (I was welcomed by those that come on here)
That's the thing with our board, if you're a City fan, you can have great discussion but there's a few that don't like outside posters. That's why I go for discussions elsewhere if I'm looking for something non-Hull related. There's a lot of posters that would probably warm to you should you show that you're there for WUM purposes.
 
And you're still biting... <whistle>

Yes, it was a pretty piss-poor way to try and turn that ridiculous and pointless thread about Proschwitz against you, and that's why it should have been a lot more obvious to you that it wasn't serious.

If I actually wanted to get one over on you, I'd do some more research and post something worth debating.

If this thread was serious, I'd admit I failed, but what's funnier, is that you actually thought it was serious and you've actually made yourself look a idiot for retaliating to such a degree.


<laugh>

So you've seriously gone out of your way to make yourself out to be a bigger prat than you already are.

Brilliant <ok> You must be chuffed <laugh> <doh>


I'll repeat what i've said. I laughed at the fact it wasn't even remotely accurate and the fact you did it to get one over on us (you won't admit that bit). We're laughing at you. If that's what you call a 'bite' then good for you <ok> Make sure you tell your family and friends about this momentous occaision <ok>
 
<laugh>

So you've seriously gone out of your way to make yourself out to be a bigger prat than you already are.

Brilliant <ok> You must be chuffed <laugh> <doh>


I'll repeat what i've said. I laughed at the fact it wasn't even remotely accurate and the fact you did it to get one over on us (you won't admit that bit). We're laughing at you. If that's what you call a 'bite' then good for you <ok> Make sure you tell your family and friends about this momentous occaision <ok>

Not really, the aim was to create a pointless thread about a player I don't know enough about to judge, to replicate a similar scenario to the Proschwitz Thread which is basically the same situation ... Which you still don't seem to understand, no matter how it's explained to you...

And I'll repeat what I've said. I'm laughing at you because I simply went on Wikipedia and threw some quotes and stats down to... Stir the hornets nest as it were. If you think that I'd use Wikipedia to back up an completely intended dig at one of your players, then you're an imbicile. <ok>
 
Not really, the aim was to create a pointless thread about a player I don't know enough about to judge, to replicate a similar scenario to the Proschwitz Thread which is basically the same situation ... Which you still don't seem to understand, no matter how it's explained to you...

So i'll explain the Prossie thread for you. Again.

Hull fans (including one of your own alter egos) were on here in the summer letting us all know that the German Ronaldo would be lighting up the Premier League in a year or so let alone the Championship and you managed to kid yourselves into justifying why he was worth 3m euros.

Hope i've finally made that clear to you <ok> <cheers>
 
So i'll explain the Possie thread for you. Again.

Hull fans (including one of your own alter egos) were on here in the summer letting us all know that the German Ronaldo would be lighting up the Premier League in a year or so let alone the Championship and you managed to kid yourselves into justifying why he was worth 3m euros.

Hope i've finally made that clear to you <ok> <cheers>

Probably about 3 fans, including Charlie, actually said something in regards to justifying his price tag. I made some points about his previous goal scoring record, that's it. I'd never claimed that he was going to storm this League because in all fairness, I knew he wouldn't.

So to make one thread about it, and keep it going after he doesn't even make an appearance, is actually much more sad than the City fans who claimed that Proschwitz was going to be a goal machine.

Wise up.
 
Probably about 3 fans, including Charlie, actually said something in regards to justifying his price tag. I made some points about his previous goal scoring record, that's it. I'd never claimed that he was going to storm this League because in all fairness, I knew he wouldn't.

So to make one thread about it, and keep it going after he doesn't even make an appearance, is actually much more sad than the City fans who claimed that Proschwitz was going to be a goal machine.

Wise up.

Not the number of fans, more the number of posts. Every other post was a Hull fan banging on about old Nick that it drowned the board out with it.

The thread is a little shrine where we can all go to see if the old boy scored. Do you think we care if he played or not? Nope, we just laugh as the weeks go by <ok>
 
Not the number of fans, more the number of posts. Every other post was a Hull fan banging on about old Nick that it drowned the board out with it.

The thread is a little shrine where we can all go to see if the old boy scored. Do you think we care if he played or not? Nope, we just laugh as the weeks go by <ok>
But the point I'm trying to make is, the thread manages to sustain itself as though he's expected to score without actually playing... Don't you think it would make more sense to create a thread for when he actually begins to start matches and regularly come off the bench rather than one or two appearances here and there?
 
But the point I'm trying to make is, the thread manages to sustain itself as though he's expected to score without actually playing... Don't you think it would make more sense to create a thread for when he actually begins to start matches and regularly come off the bench rather than one or two appearances here and there?

Oh but that would go agaist what you said at the start of the season, wouldn't it?!

'Top scorer'

'Hidden gem'

<laugh>
 
Oh but that would go agaist what you said at the start of the season, wouldn't it?!

'Top scorer'

'Hidden gem'

<laugh>
I never claimed that he'd be top scorer or that he's a hidden gem. I may have said he has the potential to be a hidden gem or something along them lines as does any player signed in this League. Lambert, Holt, Austin and Le Fodre to name a few...

It doesn't mean I thoroughly expected him to actually pay off like those players. It's a possibility.

But I reiterate, I never said that he'd be top scorer or a hidden gem. You may have mistaken me with Charlie there...
 
Amber, please can you point out where one of us has "bit"? I can't be bothered to go back and check.

I thought this thread had just descended in to more Prossie bashing to be fair. But I could be wrong.

I went back to the first page, read your post of "IUTBJF started it", realised you sounded like a 8 year old girl, laughed to myself, then gave up, it's late.

All this thread does is show that you can't take a bit of harmless banter thrown your way.
 
I never claimed that he'd be top scorer or that he's a hidden gem. I may have said he has the potential to be a hidden gem or something along them lines as does any player signed in this League. Lambert, Holt, Austin and Le Fodre to name a few...

It doesn't mean I thoroughly expected him to actually pay off like those players. It's a possibility.

But I reiterate, I never said that he'd be top scorer or a hidden gem. You may have mistaken me with Charlie there...

You = The Hull fans who were over here...

Should have made that easier for you to understand <ok>
 
Amber, please can you point out where one of us has "bit"? I can't be bothered to go back and check.

I thought this thread had just descended in to more Prossie bashing to be fair. But I could be wrong.

I went back to the first page, read your post of "IUTBJF started it", realised you sounded like a 8 year old girl, laughed to myself, then gave up, it's late.

All this thread does is show that you can't take a bit of harmless banter thrown your way.
Oh the irony... What do you think this thread was to prove? As soon as it was created, there were 4/5 posters retaliated straight away. The way they thought this thread was actually serious, was biting. <ok>


Andy King's Crown Jewels said:
You = The Hull fans who were over here...

Should have made that easier for you to understand <ok>
I apologise for not distinguishing between myself and all Hull fans when you used the word, "you" which, in a post directed at me with a question, does rather push someone towards thinking you were talking to me directly.

Not that you will have noticed though obviously.
 
I don't know, what was this thread trying to prove?

And yes of course we have replied to your question, but I wouldn't say you wound us up... We haven't sounded like we were about to cry, we haven't insulted anyone for no reason at all, and we haven't resorted to pointing out the spelling mistakes in ones posts because we have ran out of arguments...

Please tell me you don't class this reply as biting, do you?
 
Oh the irony... What do you think this thread was to prove? As soon as it was created, there were 4/5 posters retaliated straight away. The way they thought this thread was actually serious, was biting. <ok>



I apologise for not distinguishing between myself and all Hull fans when you used the word, "you" which, in a post directed at me with a question, does rather push someone towards thinking you were talking to me directly.

Not that you will have noticed though obviously.

If you honestly think we're 'biting' and, worse, if you see that as some sense of achievement, then i'm afraid you need to sort your life out <laugh>
 
I don't know, what was this thread trying to prove?

How pointless a thread of this style is. To replicate the Proschwitz thread with it's obscene accusations of him being **** for not scoring in eleven substitute appearances and one start.

Leicester fans made accusations without actually knowing a great deal about him and are judging him on his goal return. So I thought I'd throw in some pointless facts, and Waggy's current goal record this Season to show that it's pointless to judge a player when we haven't seen enough of him to judge.

As a non-Leicester fan, I'd see Waghorn has scored 2 in 15 appearances this Season and say that's ****e, but you Leicester fans claim that he plays well, which is a valid point which I can't really contest.

Proschwitz seems rather sharp and looks up for it when he comes on, but his 2 goals in 12 appearances, makes him look ****e definitely.

Andy King's Crown Jewels said:
If you honestly think we're 'biting' and, worse, if you see that as some sense of achievement, then i'm afraid you need to sort your life out
Well, if you wasn't biting, what was the retaliation for? <whistle>

You could have just said, "pointless thread" but instead, you jumped to Waggy's defence, just as you slate us for doing when we defend Proschwitz.
 
How pointless a thread of this style is. To replicate the Proschwitz thread with it's obscene accusations of him being **** for not scoring in eleven substitute appearances and one start.

Leicester fans made accusations without actually knowing a great deal about him and are judging him on his goal return. So I thought I'd throw in some pointless facts, and Waggy's current goal record this Season to show that it's pointless to judge a player when we haven't seen enough of him to judge.

As a non-Leicester fan, I'd see Waghorn has scored 2 in 15 appearances this Season and say that's ****e, but you Leicester fans claim that he plays well, which is a valid point which I can't really contest.

Proschwitz seems rather sharp and looks up for it when he comes on, but his 2 goals in 12 appearances, makes him look ****e definitely.

Wait!?

Don't believe this <laugh>

You started a thread in the exact same style as another to wind us up.....because it wound you up?!?!

This is too much <laugh> <laugh>