Champions, 67?
- Thread starter Mind The Duck
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
PFA Scotland wishes to clarify the situation with regard to the Protective Award claim referred to in the Rangers International Football Club share prospectus. There has been a reaction to the matter becoming public and it is important that PFA Scotland’s position is clearly set out to prevent any further misunderstandings.
For the avoidance of doubt, the claim for a Protective Award has been raised in the name of PFA Scotland only. It is one legal claim and has not been lodged in the name of any Player let alone some 67 individual Players as has been reported.
It is quite simply inaccurate therefore to suggest that PFA Scotland has acted here without instructions. PFA Scotland does not require instructions to raise a court action in its own name. PFA Scotland regularly represents its members as a collective – for example when speaking to the football governing bodies.
It is also important to clarify the legal basis of the claim. The law places an obligation on employers to collectively consult with trade unions/employee representatives in advance of a TUPE transfer and trade unions/ employee representatives regularly litigate such claims before Employment Tribunals.
In this instance PFA Scotland was so sufficiently concerned about the lack of communication from Duff and Phelps prior to any proposed TUPE transfer that correspondence was sent on 5th April 2012 reminding them of the Players’ rights under the TUPE legislation and recommending that these rights be highlighted to any potential buyers. This was again highlighted in the media later that month.
Unfortunately, Duff and Phelps failed to enter into any consultation whatsoever with the Players and PFA Scotland.
It may be that no player will pursue this. That will simply be a matter for each Player and in fact many of the Players have already stated that they will waive any such entitlement. It must be stressed that the motive for PFA Scotland in pursuing this claim has never been financial.
As well as being a response to the SFA Arbitration claims, the Protective Award claim involves an important point of principle since our rights as representatives of the Players were wholly disregarded by those involved in the TUPE transfer.
PFA Scotland instructed our Solicitors to write to the Solicitors for the Administrators and Rangers newco on 19th July 2012 stating that whilst PFA Scotland had the right to lodge a Protective Award claim it had no desire to do so and would abandon the claim provided certain undertakings were given including withdrawal of the SFA Arbitration.
The offer to withdraw the Protective Award claim still stands in the event of the SFA breach of contract proceedings being withdrawn against our members.
Once the SFA arbitration process and Protective Award proceedings are complete we will as always take direct instructions from individual members.
For the avoidance of doubt, the claim for a Protective Award has been raised in the name of PFA Scotland only. It is one legal claim and has not been lodged in the name of any Player let alone some 67 individual Players as has been reported.
It is quite simply inaccurate therefore to suggest that PFA Scotland has acted here without instructions. PFA Scotland does not require instructions to raise a court action in its own name. PFA Scotland regularly represents its members as a collective – for example when speaking to the football governing bodies.
It is also important to clarify the legal basis of the claim. The law places an obligation on employers to collectively consult with trade unions/employee representatives in advance of a TUPE transfer and trade unions/ employee representatives regularly litigate such claims before Employment Tribunals.
In this instance PFA Scotland was so sufficiently concerned about the lack of communication from Duff and Phelps prior to any proposed TUPE transfer that correspondence was sent on 5th April 2012 reminding them of the Players’ rights under the TUPE legislation and recommending that these rights be highlighted to any potential buyers. This was again highlighted in the media later that month.
Unfortunately, Duff and Phelps failed to enter into any consultation whatsoever with the Players and PFA Scotland.
It may be that no player will pursue this. That will simply be a matter for each Player and in fact many of the Players have already stated that they will waive any such entitlement. It must be stressed that the motive for PFA Scotland in pursuing this claim has never been financial.
As well as being a response to the SFA Arbitration claims, the Protective Award claim involves an important point of principle since our rights as representatives of the Players were wholly disregarded by those involved in the TUPE transfer.
PFA Scotland instructed our Solicitors to write to the Solicitors for the Administrators and Rangers newco on 19th July 2012 stating that whilst PFA Scotland had the right to lodge a Protective Award claim it had no desire to do so and would abandon the claim provided certain undertakings were given including withdrawal of the SFA Arbitration.
The offer to withdraw the Protective Award claim still stands in the event of the SFA breach of contract proceedings being withdrawn against our members.
Once the SFA arbitration process and Protective Award proceedings are complete we will as always take direct instructions from individual members.
It's funny because its duff and phelps that PFA Scotland have a problem with.
Another massive mindy fail.
Another massive mindy fail.
I may be wrong, but I read that as the PFA have a problem with the SFA.
In my defence I didn't even read it all.
Anyway it has nothing to do with us so mindy fail.
MD 20/20:3906649 said:
Sevco ignored them re TUPE
Sevco want the arbitration
But its nothing to do with Sevco
Sevco ignored them re TUPE
Sevco want the arbitration
But its nothing to do with Sevco
Not how I read that statement.
SFA & PFA want info from D&F as regards the player contracts and TUPE. They didn't get it. SFA are looking at breach of contract and the PFA have reacted as is their duty to the players.
EDGE.
Official POTY 2011, 2014, 2015, 2018 & 2023
I like the way he tries to bounce out of a Mindy fail and ends up belly flopping right into another.
