Champions, 67?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Mind The Duck

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2011
42,315
14,091
113
Sixty-seven players are involved in legal action against Rangers over the handling of their contracts.
PFA Scotland has raised an employment tribunal claim, which Rangers say is on behalf of 67 unnamed players, relating to a failure "to inform and consult".
The action relates to the transfer of player contracts between the oldco and newco Rangers following the sale of the oldco's assets to Charles Green's consortium.
In addition, three former players Sone Aluko, Kyle Lafferty and Jamie Ness are taking Rangers to a separate employment tribunal over the circumstances that led to them leaving the club, citing "constructive dismissal".
STV understands both claims have been lodged with HM Courts and Tribunal Service in Glasgow, though no dates for hearings have yet been set.
A consortium of businessmen led by Charles Green bought the assets of Rangers old company while it was in the hands of administrators. Player contracts were transferred to the new company under TUPE legislation when Mr Green’s consortium took control of the club.
However, several first team players refused to transfer their contracts and left for other clubs, a matter which has been taken to the Scottish Football Association for arbitration and will be heard next year.
Details of the claims being raised were detailed in a share prospectus issued by Rangers ahead of their stock market flotation.
In the prospectus, the Ibrox club challenged PFA Scotland’s right to bring a claim on behalf of 67 players and said it wants a pre-tribunal hearing to dismiss their claim.
Rangers also said that they will defend the separate claim by Aluko, Lafferty and Ness.
The share proposal also states: "They claim constructive dismissal. [Rangers Football Club Ltd] has challenged the right of these players to bring such claims for a number of separate jurisdictional reasons, but in any event these are low value claims."
Rangers believe the claims have been made "for tactical purposes" relating to the dispute over the transfer of their registration which the Scottish FA arbitration is to settle.
 
In the heat of legal action
Sevco sued for thousands
They wouldn't let them play
Ex Champions
67
 
What do you mean you are holding our registrations...we didn't TUPE to your new club

Ecky thump lad, Chuck Green says what he likes and he likes what he says and he says that he took legal advice that said he had the law on his side...down't mill, where there's muck there's brass.
 
Rangers’ lawyers believe Green’s case is water-tight with one source insisting last night: “The legal opinion we have received is that the SPFA’s case is a complete and utter non-starter. The regulations are crystal clear and this move is baseless and invalid.”
.
 
So Rangers think it's a tactical move, eh? In that case put Ally in charge of the SPFA case and we're sure fire winners. <laugh>
 
Trevor Santos:3904926 said:
Rangers&#8217; lawyers believe Green&#8217;s case is water-tight with one source insisting last night: &#8220;The legal opinion we have received is that the SPFA&#8217;s case is a complete and utter non-starter. The regulations are crystal clear and this move is baseless and invalid.&#8221;
.

Didn't Green also say HMRC would play ball
 
PFA Scotland has now been added. <ok>

List of Rangers Enemies

- BBC
- Daily Record
- Spiers
- HMRC
- SPL
- SFA
- Dundee United
- PFA Scotland

They have launched an employment tribunal claim on behalf of players that have not requested it. <laugh>

Good luck with that.
 
What is the "Record amount of Footballers to sue a 4th Tier Football Club" currently standing at?
 
What is the "Record amount of Footballers to sue a 4th Tier Football Club" currently standing at?

The Professional Footballers' Association Scotland has raised an employment tribunal claim against Rangers on behalf of 67 players.

Aluko and Jig have already said they know nothing of this action.

So PFA Scotland are raising a case against Rangers that the 67 players are unaware of.

We all know you saw the 67 and a little bit of blood rushed into your penis.

But time to calm down Mindy, more than likely nothing will come of this.
 
Good to see Medro's taking the news well.

Fumin'

Fumin indeed.

That the PFA have launched a case against us with none of the players knowing anything about it.

Realistically how many current and former players are gonna go through with this.

I think I speak for not just the Rangers fans but also the Rangers lawyers on this one when I say

Pffffffttttt