Watford FC v Hull FC, Sat 8th 2012.
- Thread starter Mexican Hornet
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Al the Hornet
Well-Known Member
Al the Hornet
Well-Known Member
I'd have said we were the better side all game. Mainly us in possession all the way through. Some handy larkers at Watford though. Maybe we should nick that Deeney in January
Sorry pal, there is no way you lot could afford him
yorkshirehornet
Well-Known Member
yorkshirehornet
Well-Known Member
Deeney needs a goal against Burnley next week to break watfords record of goals scored in consecutive games.
Maybe in possession, but everytime i see the updates on twitter it says Watford have gone close.
Anyway good luck with the rest of the season, see you boys at the KC.
You say that as though we're a poor Club?Sorry pal, there is no way you lot could afford him
You do realise the Allams are on the Sunday Times Rich List and definitely have the financial power to sign him. Though he'd probably be massively over-priced and we wouldn't go for him, we're more likely to go for Fraizer Campbell or Wood from West Brow (Loan at Millwall).
Just because we don't splash the cash left, right and centre spending money willy-nilly doesn't mean we don't have backing. We spend money more wisely than our fellow Championship rivals.
yorkshirehornet
Well-Known Member
Yorkie is going
"Just because we don't splash the cash left, right and centre spending money willy-nilly doesn't mean we don't have backing. We spend money more wisely than our fellow Championship rivals".
According to your last set of accounts the club lost £20m in one season and needed a £43m cash input. What will happen when you are only allowed to lose £5m max in a season?
According to your last set of accounts the club lost £20m in one season and needed a £43m cash input. What will happen when you are only allowed to lose £5m max in a season?
Historic Premier League wages/fees and the last of those contracts expires at the end of this season, we'll have no issues with the FFP rules.
So presumably those players with big-money contracts will simply move on, hurting your aspirations in doing so? Or do you think that they will stay on reduced money?
No, the players on big wages are ****e and won't be missed. Only McShane from the Premier League days was playing today. Our loss was under stupid, previous owners. Times have moved on, new owners, better ethos, more momentum. City's going up!
The main positive was that Zola admitted we were 2nd best and didn't pass the ball well.
Previous managers would have blamed the officials/pitch or in the case of Vialli the fans.
Certainly miss FF (with injury...not buggered off or whatever was rumoured)
Hull are top 6 for a reason and it showed.
Steve Bruce did his homework on us very well.
Previous managers would have blamed the officials/pitch or in the case of Vialli the fans.
Certainly miss FF (with injury...not buggered off or whatever was rumoured)
Hull are top 6 for a reason and it showed.
Steve Bruce did his homework on us very well.
Cant tell if your choice of word was intentional, if not thats the best line I've ever been fed.I'd have said we were the better side all game. Mainly us in possession all the way through. Some handy larkers at Watford though. Maybe we should nick that Deeney in January
Answer: Good Choice , Deeneys used to being nicked