Sandy Jardine

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, Medro.

Read what I wrote - slowly, with help from an adult if you need - and then you'll see exactly what I said.

Run along now.
 
Ignoring your "question"

As I suspected, now that we've agreed I never said I was ignoring "you" what's your question?

So which one is it, 1 or 2 or is it just the usual and the answer is whatever YOU think it is?

So you only choose to ignore certain questions from me because I'm a "tit" according to you.

That would suggest, as I said earlier, that you got skelped.

I would say option 1.

Care to answer now, is it a coincidence?

No, Medro.

Read what I wrote - slowly, with help from an adult if you need - and then you'll see exactly what I said.

Run along now.

You asked if the link is like "one of those things you buy from Clinton Cards"

I don't think they sell internet links to dictionary.com.

Could be wrong though.
 
Actually Bjk coming from a rangers fan sounds the same as a taig using the name mind the step.

More subtle aye but lets not pretend that a sellick fan called mts has several hundred different meanings either.
 
You asked if the link is like "one of those things you buy from Clinton Cards"

I don't think they sell internet links to dictionary.com.

Could be wrong though.

Don't worry; whether you are wrong never seems to bother you, nor does your poor grasp of basic English comprehension.
 
Try explaining yourself a little better in the future.

Rangers not606 board > Celtic game

My explanation was fine, your ability to figure out a simple sentence was found wanting.

I'm sitting in the house, watching the telly and typing away. Easy.
 
Maybe to yourself.

Must be a **** game if you're on here.

No, it's clear to anyone who has even the slightest degree of comprehension of the English language.

The game was a bit ****, actually. 2-1 to Benfica. Too many silly mistakes from us, but hey, there's always Spartak in a couple of weeks in the final group game of the world's premier club tournament. Dining at the top table, as an ex-club's fans used to say.

Night, night.
 
No, it's clear to anyone who has even the slightest degree of comprehension of the English language.

The game was a bit ****, actually. 2-1 to Benfica. Too many silly mistakes from us, but hey, there's always Spartak in a couple of weeks in the final group game of the world's premier club tournament. Dining at the top table, as an ex-club's fans used to say.

Night, night.

I guess Benfica had the pork tonight?

You must log in or register to see images
 
So you only choose to ignore certain questions from me because I'm a "tit" according to you.

That would suggest, as I said earlier, that you got skelped.

I would say option 1.

Care to answer now, is it a coincidence?



Could be wrong though.

<laugh> The day you skelp me is the day I leave the forum for good.

Is what a coincidence? That you have said he had a signature related to Rangers and at one time an avatar related to Rangers?

I honestly don't recall but i'll take your word for it just for the sake of clarity.

Ok he had a Rangers related signature and Avatar so what does that mean? What kind of mind is at work? Well only he knows that, I tend to not read too much into what people are not actually saying, I tend to go on what they are either saying now or what they have said in the past. That's how I form an opinion on people and I tend to remember which group people fall into, idiots, reasonable people, WUMs or bigots etc.

It's only an opinion mind and mine at that for what it's worth, but I don't get any sense of MTS being a sicko, a wum certainly at times, but people who live in glass houses and all that...Anyhoo, as I already explained I have seen no evidence (that I recall) of him mocking the victims, perhaps if he does I will be forced to reconsider my position on the subject and accept that yes he is a sicko. Be sure and keep your eyes peeled for any changes to his Avatar and signature and let everyone else know what new subliminal messages he's sending out, you being one of the people on the forum who change sigs and avatars on a regular basis are well placed to act as the guardian of morality and onboard psychologist.

Any more questions? I'm in a jovial mood and feeling fancy free.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.