Mouser Watch #2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I get the feeling that I could post a gif of a Liverpool player shooting an opposition player on here and somebody would say, "Well he didn't use a very big gun, so it wasn't that bad".
 
I give up <doh> talk about see only what you want to see!!...the guy is a loose cannon. He will seriously injure an opposition player very soon, if he's allowed to continue. Neither of those examples is bad timing, or anything other than malicious assault.
You make him sound like a rampaging lunatic, running around the pitch with a hammer trying to smash someone's head in! Talk about sensationalism.

Suarez has a bite to his game (literally, before someone else says it) and has a habbit of leaving a bit in a tackle, but the overwhelming majority of his 'assaults' are really bad timing. In the first video clip of his 'stamp', you can easily see he's intended to step across the ball and put his body infront of the wigan player to shield it - probably drawing the foul against him. He does it alot, actually, and most the time it works but this time Jones was fast getting to the ball and thus, Suarez's foot went onto his ankle rather than the ground.

Most forwards are awful at timing tackles. Suarez is no exception. Yes there's a small deliberate part to his game, but most isn't intended and he certainly doesn't go out his way to break legs! Give up the witch hunt already.

Edit, I notice no one mentions the good side to him; like last week against Chelsea when he was pushed into Terry causing injury and, whereas most 'pool players were nowhere to be seen, Suarez was within 10yards of Terry the whole time making sure he was ok right until he was stretchered off. No one mentions that because he's a vicious, malicious assaulter, right?
 
You make him sound like a rampaging lunatic, running around the pitch with a hammer trying to smash someone's head in! Talk about sensationalism.

Suarez has a bite to his game (literally, before someone else says it) and has a habbit of leaving a bit in a tackle, but the overwhelming majority of his 'assaults' are really bad timing. In the first video clip of his 'stamp', you can easily see he's intended to step across the ball and put his body infront of the wigan player to shield it - probably drawing the foul against him. He does it alot, actually, and most the time it works but this time Jones was fast getting to the ball and thus, Suarez's foot went onto his ankle rather than the ground.

Most forwards are awful at timing tackles. Suarez is no exception. Yes there's a small deliberate part to his game, but most isn't intended and he certainly doesn't go out his way to break legs! Give up the witch hunt already.

Edit, I notice no one mentions the good side to him; like last week against Chelsea when he was pushed into Terry causing injury and, whereas most 'pool players were nowhere to be seen, Suarez was within 10yards of Terry the whole time making sure he was ok right until he was stretchered off. No one mentions that because he's a vicious, malicious assaulter, right?

If you can't , or choose not to, see the blindingly obvious in those video examples, then really, I give up. This is not a witch hunt, as you term it. It's nothing more than pointing out the truth. A truth you clearly don't wish to acknowledge.
 
This is assault

You must log in or register to see images



This is a yellow card by comparison.

You must log in or register to see images



This is someone who is trying to elbow Gerrard, but the shortarse wasn't tall or quick enough.

You must log in or register to see images


What total bollocks! Adebayor's is clumsy, and stupid. What Suarez does is clear intent to injure a fellow professional!
 
What total bollocks! Adebayor's is clumsy, and stupid. What Suarez does is clear intent to injure a fellow professional!

Jeezus!!!!

<laugh>

Here's you giving us stick for sticking up for Suarez and you do the same for Adebayor who's tackle was both feet off the ground and stud's up and absolutely disgraceful, but because hes a Spurs player it's "clumsy".<doh>
 
Edit, I notice no one mentions the good side to him; like last week against Chelsea when he was pushed into Terry causing injury and, whereas most 'pool players were nowhere to be seen, Suarez was within 10yards of Terry the whole time making sure he was ok right until he was stretchered off. No one mentions that because he's a vicious, malicious assaulter, right?



Hm. I think what we saw there was Suarez's guilty conscious at work. He was probably thinking, "Christ! I'm finally going to get slaughtered by the FA for having taken the piss with them for so long."

Miraculously, of course, he escaped censure, yet again. One cannot help but to think that the FA is making a massive rod for its own back, especially when it has to explain why, week in and week out, it turned a blind-eye to the thuggery.
 
What total bollocks! Adebayor's is clumsy, and stupid. What Suarez does is clear intent to injure a fellow professional!

One is clumsy, the other is definitely deliberate. Definitely not a case of club bias there, eh?

For someone asking people to take off their club tinted glasses you are sure doing a good job of keeping your glasses on.
 
If you can't , or choose not to, see the blindingly obvious in those video examples, then really, I give up. This is not a witch hunt, as you term it. It's nothing more than pointing out the truth. A truth you clearly don't wish to acknowledge.
Typical. You have nothing to say in response so you simply blindly repeat the same **** you've said for 2 pages. Bravo. Seems that discussion, debate and arguements are a lost art.

You say I choose not to see where in fact, I explained what I saw. You do nothing of the sort.
 
Hm. I think what we saw there was Suarez's guilty conscious at work. He was probably thinking, "Christ! I'm finally going to get slaughtered by the FA for having taken the piss with them for so long."

Miraculously, of course, he escaped censure, yet again. One cannot help but to think that the FA is making a massive rod for its own back, especially when it has to explain why, week in and week out, it turned a blind-eye to the thuggery.
Now that's just moronic. Suarez was pushed by a Chelsea player into Terry <doh>
He was in no danger of being booked or punished by the FA for anything. What you saw was genuine concern.
 
Now that's just moronic. Suarez was pushed by a Chelsea player into Terry <doh>
He was in no danger of being booked or punished by the FA for anything. What you saw was genuine concern.

Yeah, I can't think of any reason that Terry and Suarez have to stick together... <whistle>

I heard that he was trying to get his own back after this, anyway:

You must log in or register to see images
 
Yeah, I can't think of any reason that Terry and Suarez have to stick together... <whistle>

I heard that he was trying to get his own back after this, anyway:

You must log in or register to see images
Are you 14 or something?

Watch the replay then come back and tell me what happened.
If you 'cba' to watch the replay or 'don't care enough' (in which case why are you even here talking about it), then you have zero weight in any discussion.
Pushed into him. Fact.
 
Are you 14 or something?

Watch the replay then come back and tell me what happened.
If you 'cba' to watch the replay or 'don't care enough' (in which case why are you even here talking about it), then you have zero weight in any discussion.
Pushed into him. Fact.

How on earth did you take that seriously? What happened to the famous Scouse sense of humour? <doh>
 
Typical. You have nothing to say in response so you simply blindly repeat the same **** you've said for 2 pages. Bravo. Seems that discussion, debate and arguements are a lost art.

You say I choose not to see where in fact, I explained what I saw. You do nothing of the sort.

Absolute bollocks! It's you who chooses to continue to defend the blatantly indefensible. You SAW only what, as a Liverpool supporter, you wanted to see. Not what is actually happening.