It was Brucies **** up

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
My only arguement with the Bent deal was why did he not make Carew part of the deal or at least get him on loan instead he went to Stoke and left us with no one.[/QUOTE

Cos we have found out now hes a tosser, and has made some right ****e decisions
 
If the numbers didn't work out we should have asked Villa for the full amount and not in instalments like some dodgy catalogue. The club is to blame for that if true and will give SB the benefit on this occasion.


It seems this practise is common place at SOL. I remember an interview just after the club posted a loss for the last financial year, Bruce said they had split the payments to spurs for Bent over a number of years and we had done the same when we sold him.

i think theres new UEFA rules about it aswell. Something about the transfer fee being split over the length of the new contract.
 
it seems this practise is common place at sol. I remember an interview just after the club posted a loss for the last financial year, bruce said they had split the payments to spurs for bent over a number of years and we had done the same when we sold him.

I think theres new uefa rules about it aswell. Something about the transfer fee being split over the length of the new contract.


pity we couldnt split brucies arse over the length of the bad run
 
The problem was that we already had our maximum permitted loan players from PL teams with Onuoha and Welbeck. Any loan deal for a striker would have had to have come from abroad.


Again **** management leave one loan place free for emergencies in the window.Thats what its for for **** sake