can i just say that this is total tosh. just because someone played the game to a high level does NOT mean they are a 'guru', for want of a better word, on the game. garth crooks is an abomination when it comes to talking football. lawro is not far behind in being as bad a pundit as there has ever been. this is not something merely illustrated by norwich fans, but by the wider footballing world in general. now obviously ipswich never get high enough up the food chain these days to be 'spoken of' by lawro, but if they did you'd be making the exact same comments.
I like this discussion - I place my fingers in my ears (or the Not606 equivalent) and go...... lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala
The accuracy of Lawro's predictions for Norwich City results is a determinable value. As it happens, this season, by my reckoning, his accuracy has improved slightly. I appreciate that for the most part the flak he gets on here has nothing really to do with his predictions in general, only his prediction three years ago that we were headed for League Two. Good fun as it is, surely he's long since been given the best answer possible?
The best answer possible would be for Auntie Beeb to terminate his contract and employ someone without Anfield blinkers on and a sound, all round knowledge of the game. Time for a cull, in fact - taxi for Lawrenson, Crooks and Claridge
Agree with Robbie He got the result and score bang on last week from memory He's coming round to us! Happy fishing guru
So i presume as you lot think Lawro is **** and knows **** all about football think you will lose on Saturday then?
perfectly fair question though Carra, either Lawro is a **** who talks out of his ass, so in that case means that you lot expect to lose, or he might know a bit more than you give him credit, so you might win? you can't call him a useless **** and then agree with him!
