I should have clarified and said "I don't start posts/threads about other people".
Happy to clear that up![]()
Nice back track.
How do you "start a post" rather than just post?
I should have clarified and said "I don't start posts/threads about other people".
Happy to clear that up![]()
Apologies, busy afternoon in work.
You might want to brush up on your history to see who your main domestic competitor has been the last 15 years and also the highest attendances you got during that time.
Yes you had pish attendances for games back then, but your ticket sales improved grew each year DURING THE RECESSION. And just to note, the stats I supplied are SPL stats, Iâm guessing those figures that you supplied are for cup games, correct?
So tell me, how is it important that season ticket sales decreased yet itâs not important to you that overall ticket sales increased. It seems youâre ignoring one point to strengthen your own.
And you seem to continuously disregard the fact that DURING THE RECESSION the number of ticket sales for your club still increased.
So that £20 difference shouldnât make a difference but youâre saying it is? And the fact that Rangers are not challenging for the SPL title and there will be no old Firm games makes no difference?
You keep banging on about ticket sales, yet ignore the fact that your ticket sales have actually increased.
2009/10 866,061
2010/11 930,395
2011/12 967,182

Apologies, busy afternoon in work.
You might want to brush up on your history to see who your main domestic competitor has been the last 15 years and also the highest attendances you got during that time.
Yes you had pish attendances for games back then, but your ticket sales improved grew each year DURING THE RECESSION. And just to note, the stats I supplied are SPL stats, I’m guessing those figures that you supplied are for cup games, correct?
So tell me, how is it important that season ticket sales decreased yet it’s not important to you that overall ticket sales increased. It seems you’re ignoring one point to strengthen your own.
And you seem to continuously disregard the fact that DURING THE RECESSION the number of ticket sales for your club still increased.
So that £20 difference shouldn’t make a difference but you’re saying it is? And the fact that Rangers are not challenging for the SPL title and there will be no old Firm games makes no difference?
You keep banging on about ticket sales, yet ignore the fact that your ticket sales have actually increased.
2009/10 866,061
2010/11 930,395
2011/12 967,182
Chapper,
That must've bored the tits right aff you![]()
I've revised it to 8 (I thought Gambol's was about Killie - my bad)

As you please, Chapsteroonie.
You wouldn't read AP's post cos it was too long yet read the spastic's mammoth multi-post on exactly the same subject from the opposite angle.
What was it you said about arguing black and white again?
and only this week responded to a CQN blog.There's 2 points between 1st and 4th - compare that with the years when Celtic and Rangers were ten clear of everyone by this stage.
I've had a letter asking me to renew at some point during the summer for at least the past three years - funny how this year's one is suddenly some sort of begging letter.
I'm not going to even ask what "sly digs at Rangers" there were in any letter/encouragement to renew - Lawwell wasn't outside the main stand shouting "Tiocfaidh Ar La" or referring to Rangers as "that mob up the road".
If it's the "unbroken history" stuff then, yes, it's using the current situation to sell Celtic to the supporters in light of what's happened to Rangers.
To compare, a certain CEO responded to a Celtic fan on a radio phone inand only this week responded to a CQN blog.
Graham/Poole/McMurdo/Leggat have blogged incessantly this year about Lawwell - all sorts of bizarre conspiracy crap when they all ignored things staring them in the face.
Lawwell's response can best be described thusfar as "dignified silence" to borrow a phrase from somewhere.
Yes you had pish attendances for games back then, but your ticket sales improved grew each year DURING THE RECESSION. And just to note, the stats I supplied are SPL stats, Iâm guessing those figures that you supplied are for cup games, correct?
So tell me, how is it important that season ticket sales decreased yet itâs not important to you that overall ticket sales increased. It seems youâre ignoring one point to strengthen your own.
And you seem to continuously disregard the fact that DURING THE RECESSION the number of ticket sales for your club still increased.
So that £20 difference shouldnât make a difference but youâre saying it is? And the fact that Rangers are not challenging for the SPL title and there will be no old Firm games makes no difference?
You keep banging on about ticket sales, yet ignore the fact that your ticket sales have actually increased.
2009/10 866,061
2010/11 930,395
2011/12 967,182


Nice back track.
How do you "start a post" rather than just post?
Bastard
Simply put attendances are down because Rangers are not in the SPL.
That is the MAIN reason.
School uniform prices etc may have had some effect but the MAIN and most costly reason is Rangers absence from the SPL.
What do you think Einstein?
In this case the term post/thread are interchangable but i know you are a stickler so I will further rephrase. I don't start threads about other posters.
There you go.

Just noticed there's a pretty spartan crowd at Celtic Park, that must be because Rangers are not in this competition...
Oh wait a minute.

As stated previously, nice back track
Talking of low attendances - judging by the telly there's about 2 people at CP tonight for the league cup game
Is THAT because of Rangers too?
