why ?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
dylansdadjumpsup

dylansdadjumpsup

Member
Jan 27, 2011
77
0
6
NULL
jones sold = no replacement . bent sold = no replacement
goals win games thats were weve went wrong selling players
without replacing them no tactics poor substitutions
we are **** that mr quinn is why we dont fill our ground .
 
dylansdadjumpsup said:
jones sold = no replacement . bent sold = no replacement
goals win games thats were weve went wrong selling players
without replacing them no tactics poor substitutions
we are **** that mr quinn is why we dont fill our ground .
Click to expand...

Jones sold..I remember on 606 everyone saying well done Bruce, Gyan is better.

Bent sold..I remember many saying he should be dropped, not doing it then judas dropping us in it.

Campbell injury, could not be foreseen
Welbeck then Gyan doing harmstrings, could not be foreseen
Noble doing back, could not be foreseen

Not a lot of options on tactics yesterday
 
cyprussydsafc said:
Jones sold..I remember on 606 everyone saying well done Bruce, Gyan is better.

Bent sold..I remember many saying he should be dropped, not doing it then judas dropping us in it.

Not a lot of options on tactics yesterday
Click to expand...

perhaps if he'd replaced Jones and Bent.......................
 
cyprussydsafc said:
he replaced Jones with Gyan, we all said great

he tried to replace bent, easier said than done but who would you have bought?
Click to expand...

agree... easier said than done..... however that’s no excuse.......then again whoever we could have got would have ended up injured anyway
 
commachio said:
at that time i would have said crouch,

proves how much i know...
Click to expand...

all I'm trying to say, its all I'm saying on all threads, its easy in hindsight. Bruce is making mistakes, I have my doudts, I'm not happy with things but we must try and be fair. Like you have said many times, we pick a the team Bruce does, they lose then we blame Bruce for picking the team.
 
bet no one picks s'land on their playstations or x boxes, cos when they lose,

they'd still blame bruce...
 
cyprussydsafc said:
all I'm trying to say, its all I'm saying on all threads, its easy in hindsight. Bruce is making mistakes, I have my doudts, I'm not happy with things but we must try and be fair. Like you have said many times, we pick a the team Bruce does, they lose then we blame Bruce for picking the team.
Click to expand...

The only difference is that we are not qualified (and I don't necessarily mean just by written qualifications) to pick the team, he is..........

****...... what if Bruce is a sheep and is just picking the team we want him to
 
commachio said:
he is and everyone is still on his back, SOB save our bruce...
Click to expand...

Comes with the territory though mate……….. gods when they do a good job…… pieces of **** when they don’t………..nowt new in that………..SOB……..Shoot Ogre Bruce
 
safc73 said:
Comes with the territory though mate……….. gods when they do a good job…… pieces of **** when they don’t………..nowt new in that………..SOB……..Shoot Ogre Bruce
Click to expand...

I have noticed a theme in your posts SAFC, sheep
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back