why ?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Jan 27, 2011
77
0
6
NULL
jones sold = no replacement . bent sold = no replacement
goals win games thats were weve went wrong selling players
without replacing them no tactics poor substitutions
we are **** that mr quinn is why we dont fill our ground .
 
jones sold = no replacement . bent sold = no replacement
goals win games thats were weve went wrong selling players
without replacing them no tactics poor substitutions
we are **** that mr quinn is why we dont fill our ground .

Jones sold..I remember on 606 everyone saying well done Bruce, Gyan is better.

Bent sold..I remember many saying he should be dropped, not doing it then judas dropping us in it.

Campbell injury, could not be foreseen
Welbeck then Gyan doing harmstrings, could not be foreseen
Noble doing back, could not be foreseen

Not a lot of options on tactics yesterday
 
Jones sold..I remember on 606 everyone saying well done Bruce, Gyan is better.

Bent sold..I remember many saying he should be dropped, not doing it then judas dropping us in it.

Not a lot of options on tactics yesterday

perhaps if he'd replaced Jones and Bent.......................
 
he replaced Jones with Gyan, we all said great

he tried to replace bent, easier said than done but who would you have bought?

agree... easier said than done..... however that’s no excuse.......then again whoever we could have got would have ended up injured anyway
 
at that time i would have said crouch,

proves how much i know...

all I'm trying to say, its all I'm saying on all threads, its easy in hindsight. Bruce is making mistakes, I have my doudts, I'm not happy with things but we must try and be fair. Like you have said many times, we pick a the team Bruce does, they lose then we blame Bruce for picking the team.
 
bet no one picks s'land on their playstations or x boxes, cos when they lose,

they'd still blame bruce...
 
all I'm trying to say, its all I'm saying on all threads, its easy in hindsight. Bruce is making mistakes, I have my doudts, I'm not happy with things but we must try and be fair. Like you have said many times, we pick a the team Bruce does, they lose then we blame Bruce for picking the team.

The only difference is that we are not qualified (and I don't necessarily mean just by written qualifications) to pick the team, he is..........

****...... what if Bruce is a sheep and is just picking the team we want him to
 
he is and everyone is still on his back, SOB save our bruce...

Comes with the territory though mate……….. gods when they do a good job…… pieces of **** when they don’t………..nowt new in that………..SOB……..Shoot Ogre Bruce
 
Comes with the territory though mate……….. gods when they do a good job…… pieces of **** when they don’t………..nowt new in that………..SOB……..Shoot Ogre Bruce

I have noticed a theme in your posts SAFC, sheep