Adkins out? (poll)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should we sack Adkins?

  • Yes sack him.

  • No keep him.

Results are only viewable after voting.
gomarchingin said:
So does Cortese get involve in football matters ? I say he does this confirms it , I get hammered for it and I still have Mrs Plum in the dining room with the lead pipe .

I am very confused...................
Click to expand...

I was told Cortese doesn't know enough to be able to get involved. Which I said in my first post.
 
Beef_Dripping said:
I don't know about the HAS part, but from what I was told 4-3-3 is Reeds idea. He wants it to be played at every level (which it is ), Reed is the Head of football development. He is above Adkins already, which means he has no need to ask Cortese to make Adkins obey him.
Click to expand...

On the has part who do you think ?
 
Les Reed has done a fantastic job for the club in the last two years. Why are we now bashing him? Possibly because he does not come out in the press every week, so he is an easy target.
 
gomarchingin said:
So therefore on that logic we should be asking or the poll should whether Reed should be pushed out .

What does our Nige do ?

Reed = Formations
Cortese = Purcahses
Nigel = Tea making and picking the lads up ?
Click to expand...

Well that is very much the problem, if rumours are to be believed he is being very much stifled.
 
He won't be under threat for a while.

Obviously if things don't improve them maybe some people will start to question his position.

But I think it is very hard to do so after a short space of time, against the teams we've played, where it is a learning curve for EVERYONE involved around the football club. <ok>
 
I cant believe Adkins would of taken a job whereby he negates his position by saying someone can buy the players for him , he has to stick to a rigid formation , and if it goes wrong he carries the can .

Makes Lee Harvey Oswald seem a trivial thing indeed .
 
gomarchingin said:
I cant believe Adkins would of taken a job whereby he negates his position by saying someone can buy the players for him , he has to stick to a rigid formation , and if it goes wrong he carries the can .

Makes Lee Harvey Oswald seem a trivial thing indeed .
Click to expand...

Well rumours are rumours. Even if you do believe them we have no time scale of when Adkins started to lose his responsibilities.
 
Qwerty said:
Les Reed has done a fantastic job for the club in the last two years. Why are we now bashing him? Possibly because he does not come out in the press every week, so he is an easy target.
Click to expand...

Only saying what I have been told.
 
I would say keep him, he has a tough task but I don't feel anyone else would do better at the moment, I think he will keep you up as he has been unlucky that you have had some tough games.
 
Qwerty said:
Yeah sorry I am not talking to you/whoever told you, just those that are being quick to criticise everyone at the club.

Anyway I'm off out for the afternoon so everyone behave :laugh:
Click to expand...

Enjoy , I am thinking about painting the downstairs toilet , I say thinking about it .........................
 
gomarchingin said:
I cant believe Adkins would of taken a job whereby he negates his position by saying someone can buy the players for him , he has to stick to a rigid formation , and if it goes wrong he carries the can .

Makes Lee Harvey Oswald seem a trivial thing indeed .
Click to expand...

Having read through this whole thread the only person suggesting this 'rumour' is you <doh>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back