Adkins out? (poll)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should we sack Adkins?

  • Yes sack him.

  • No keep him.


Results are only viewable after voting.
I'm not one for making up **** am i?.

Only you know whether that is true, but the post needs more meat, on it's own it is lacking in information, spill the beans, dish the dirt, we are all ears. You must also be privy to whom we are turning to replace him. The worse you will get is a horses head in your bed.
 
<laugh> Well I was told it was Reed that is the guy that is obsessed with the 4-3-3.

Makes a hell of a lot more sense than Cortese dictating it, after all as director of football it is his job to get involved. I still don't think it's likely that this is being imposed at all costs though, and it seems obvious that Adkins has bought into it as well.
 
Makes a hell of a lot more sense than Cortese dictating it, after all as director of football it is his job to get involved. I still don't think it's likely that this is being imposed at all costs though, and it seems obvious that Adkins has bought into it as well.
Agreed makes far more sense, from what I have heard Cortese knows hardly anything about football. All he does know is the simple rules etc.
 
Agreed makes far more sense, from what I have heard Cortese knows hardly anything about football. All he does know is the simple rules etc.

Not having a pop you're a good poster and reliable. But has your source given you anything else that HAS happened? That way we can sorta get an idea of how reliable he is without you telling us who he/she is? :)
 
Not having a pop you're a good poster and reliable. But has your source given you anything else that HAS happened? That way we can sorta get an idea of how reliable he is without you telling us who he/she is? :)

He has never told me anything before, he said he was just pissed off with people (Le Tiss included) slagging the wrong person.
 
Thought we needed a pole. No wishy washy answers I.E "oh give him some more time". Just a simple yes or no.

Just at this moment do you think he should be our manager?

Poll is anonymous but feel free to argue about it in here. :)

(I should stress I'm not a whiner just wanted to see which side the forum will take).

Any view on the result so far? Seems fairly positive for NA.
 
This is a load of rubbish Adkins picks the team and makes the decisions. Do you really think he would listen to a failed manager in Les Reed if it meant losing every week and playing the way we are?. Don't be daft.
 
I have heard from a mate who works at St Marys, that Cortese has very little to do with the football side of Saints. Only really signing off cheques etc. There is a person that has implemented a 4-3-3 in all our teams and has said to the coaches of each level that this is the formation he wants to be played.

IMHO you only have to look at his comments on the O/S Plyer he says " We will play 4-3-3 " he did not look happy to me when he said it ...........

IF someone is telling the manager what formation he WILL play , god help us !
 
Sorry but is this correct ? Les Reed wants a 4-3-3 and Adkins HAS to play it ? Who has ordered Adkins to obey Reed ?

I don't know about the HAS part, but from what I was told 4-3-3 is Reeds idea. He wants it to be played at every level (which it is ), Reed is the Head of football development. He is above Adkins already, which means he has no need to ask Cortese to make Adkins obey him.