Mouser Watch #2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
'The Past? because their fans are more interested in that than the present.' Ummm no. We have a great history yes, but believe me we are a lot more interested in what's happening at our club today, like any football fan.

'The present as their fans think they're better than they actually are.' Ummm no again. we actually know how bad we are at the moment, that's why we look forward to your next point about the future.

'The future as sooner rather than later a generation knowing nothing but Liverpool failure will replace them.' Maybe, but the future also holds good things in terms of the young players coming through, which hopefully a whole new generation of Liverpool fans (and the current ones) can enjoy and hopefully see bring some success.


So to summarise, you're whole post is basically you, a fan of another club, spouting bollocks about a club and set of fans you obviously know very little about.

Check mate.
 
Let's just analyse that little summing up of yours a little, shall we?

Liverpool fans don't bang on about the past: With the exception of every Liverpool fan on this site, those who bang on about Shankley and Paisley to all the phone-ins, those that said how Dalglish would return the club to glory because he managed them twenty years before...

Liverpool fans don't realise how bad their present is: Really? Let's look at the Merseyside form table shall we?

Tranmere: P11 W8 D3 L0
Everton: P7 W4 D2 L1
Southport P14 W4 D2 L6
Liverpool: P7 W1 D3 L3

Now let's consider how your fellow Loserpudlians talk about the club on our board, making out they're much higher up the league than they are. And that sums up the last couple of seasons as well. Does that really demonstrate awareness to you?

The only reason Liverpool were keeping pace with the CL places was because their players weren't being poached by Man Utd or Chelsea, unlike players at Spurs or Villa. These days, there's little interest from MUPLC, City or Chelsea in their players to begin with - that's a big sea change.

Future generations can expect success: People were saying the same about Leeds ten years ago. Promoted as runners-up in League One is the biggest success they've had since then.

How many games have been played again? What teams have Liverpool played? I take it your not a Watford fan then so I'll remind you of one very embarrassing incident for Spurs fans from last season that come back and bit them on the arse when Chavs won the Cup and all other fans pissed themselves over.

MIND THE GAP
 
HBIC, do you actually read what people post or just ignore it and carry on spouting the bull**** that suits your agenda?

I said we are looking forward to seeing our crop of young players improve, not that this guarantees success. I also said most Liverpool fans acknowledge the situation we are currently in, which you chose to ignore, by posting your Merseyside League table. Do you think we don't know this? We can read, we do watch our games, we have got friends that support Everton, so yes we know where we are.

You obviously hate Liverpool so much you just have to keep on ranting. Calm down you'll make yourself poorly. :mad:

Which is funny as none of these Spurs fans do besies 5 mins on MOTD yet feel their well qualified to talk about Liverpools performances when they hardly seen any.

Your saying about the young players, which is true we have some top top prospects about to break through, but I bet you most on here could name one, maybe two of them at the most. But they all about Liverpool FC though.
 
Actually, it does - the correct phrase is "plans for redeveloping our stadium...you know, Everton's ground."



At a guess, you can name the Deputy Prime Minister, Chancellor and Home Minister, and probably the VP of the USA, i.e. the most senior figures aside from the Prime Minister/President.

Also, Jim Boyce was elected - to the Irish Football Association. FIFA cherrypicks from those, especially the British ones because half their board is given over to one individual each from England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales (with the other four representing the rest of the world)



The petty resposne is Suarez's, but what do you expect from him?



Not really, given it's highly unlikely that Bale would have given a response so childish, nor does our club have a victim complex in the stands as well as the dugout that brought it to Boyce's attention in the first place. I repeat, if Rodgers kept his mouth shut, would Boyce have named Suarez? Probably not.

Because Gareth Bale has never been petulant or used the media to insult anyone?

Also, my phrasing was fine, you just interpreted it the wrong way, which is understandable. Certainly not incorrect. But again, a moot point that I won't go into again.

I don't think I can go to a polling station and vote for a member of the IFA, can I? I don't think very many people could name the higher echelons, apart from Sepp Blatter. When you see Suarez's name in the news, just breath, count to ten and then keep browsing.
 
Blimey Toela, you must have had a boring night! Calling HBIC a Watford fan may have been libellous by the way.
 
Because Gareth Bale has never been petulant or used the media to insult anyone?

You mean the player who deliberately tried to injure him on two separate occasions?

How many games have been played again? What teams have Liverpool played? I take it your not a Watford fan then so I'll remind you of one very embarrassing incident for Spurs fans from last season that come back and bit them on the arse when Chavs won the Cup and all other fans pissed themselves over.

MIND THE GAP

Everton have played several of the teams Liverpool have, and got better results - it's right there in black and white that Everton have won four times more games or, if you prefer, Liverpool have lost three times more.

Your worse than HIAG. Your weirdly obsessed. And aren't you a Watford fan did I see someone say?

Strange.

You call somebody "obsessed" in the middle of you posting eleven straight replies to the same topic, which isn't on your club's board. Shouldn't you be taking your tablets? Seriously, I've seen more logical behaviour from people with OCD.

As for Oh, and by all means, post a link to where someone said I was a Watford fan. Go on, do it, prove it exists. If you can't, just admit you're a sad, pathetic liar and apologise for being such an idiot. Just the one post, though.
 
Arsenal defender Laurent Koscielny, 27, has branded Liverpool's 25-year-old striker Luis Suarez a "diver" and a "cheat" in a French interview. "He is tiresome to defend against. He cheats. He pulls your shirt, giving small blows," said Koscielny. "He is a player who likes to dive as soon as there is contact."

(Source: The Sun)




First he was vilified for being a racist, and now he is being lambasted for being a cheat.

Will there be no end to the shame that he heaps on a once great club?
 
How many games have been played again? What teams have Liverpool played? I take it your not a Watford fan then so I'll remind you of one very embarrassing incident for Spurs fans from last season that come back and bit them on the arse when Chavs won the Cup and all other fans pissed themselves over.

MIND THE GAP

Let's get this right - Spurs go through against a very spirited side who gave them a hell of a match but couldn't hit the target and it's very embarrassing? You lot had to wait till penalties to beat Cardiff FFS.
 
Let's get this right - Spurs go through against a very spirited side who gave them a hell of a match but couldn't hit the target and it's very embarrassing? You lot had to wait till penalties to beat Cardiff FFS.

There was the small business of beating Stoke, Chelsea and City away final before getting the chance of winning the 'final' on penalties.
 
There was the small business of beating Stoke, Chelsea and City away final before getting the chance of winning the 'final' on penalties.


Yeah but it doesn't suit the nonsense to put it all down to beating Cardiff on penalties <ok>

I mean, if you want nonsense just listen to Arry
Gareth Bale in Ronaldo and Messi's class, says Redknapp is the beeb headline.

Can we pull up the stats of all 3 to compare for the laugh. I think Messi scored more last year than bale has in total for spurs?

Oh Arry, and they slated Rafa, Arry is 10 times the twat and according to Spurs fans arry with a better squad..a better squad than Rafa they said over and over and over, still managed to win fk all, even Kenny took over the same team albeit degraded and still managed a trophy and another final.

But Spurs not winning the league was all the media's fault, not Arry's or the players <laugh>

Booing your team with a new coach at the 2nd game of the season is more than a little plastic, I can understand mancs, but it took getting into the CL once to do this to spuds fans <laugh>
 
Dan, you are attempting to argue against Mouser delusion, and you are bound to fail.

The best thing to do is smile sweetly, and let them get it out of their system (which may take several more seasons of abject 'Pool failure).

All we can do is continue to assess 'Pool's plight in our objective, rational, and non-wumming fashion, and hope that, eventually, enough Mousers will join with us in understanding that 'Pool is now a spent force in world football.
 
A twat your Chairman was absolutely desperate to - twice - come and take over from Redknapp. It was a done deal until Dalglish got sacked, Hodge got England and the waters were muddied.

What part of your imagination did you dredge that fantasy up from?
The only link to anything like that on a quick Google search appeared to be from The Sun. Should you be reading that?
 
You mean the player who deliberately tried to injure him on two separate occasions?



Everton have played several of the teams Liverpool have, and got better results - it's right there in black and white that Everton have won four times more games or, if you prefer, Liverpool have lost three times more.



You call somebody "obsessed" in the middle of you posting eleven straight replies to the same topic, which isn't on your club's board. Shouldn't you be taking your tablets? Seriously, I've seen more logical behaviour from people with OCD.

As for Oh, and by all means, post a link to where someone said I was a Watford fan. Go on, do it, prove it exists. If you can't, just admit you're a sad, pathetic liar and apologise for being such an idiot. Just the one post, though.

'Deliberately' is a bit harsh. No doubt Adam is a very poor tackler, who I intensely disliked at Liverpool - but he wasn't an overly malicious player (ala Keane).
 
'Deliberately' is a bit harsh. No doubt Adam is a very poor tackler, who I intensely disliked at Liverpool - but he wasn't an overly malicious player (ala Keane).

not harsh at all,he went in each time to take out Bale,you just have to look and you can see him looking where Bale's leg's are,not where the ball is.
 
'Deliberately' is a bit harsh. No doubt Adam is a very poor tackler, who I intensely disliked at Liverpool - but he wasn't an overly malicious player (ala Keane).

The tackle in pre-season was one of those tackles made to take a player out, rather than get the ball - a Taribo West Special, in other words.

Wow, fifteen years and he's still my most hated centre back ever...
 
Bollocks any of Adam's tackles were deliberate.

You sound like us with our conspiracy theorises.

The unmitiagted fact of the matter is that Adam is a big fat ****ing fraud of a footballer who is so **** and slow that even when he tries to tackle a player they've usually already gone past him and he misses the ball and gets their legs instead. The proof of this is that nearly every game he gets a yellow for a ****e tackle in midfield.
 
Bollocks any of Adam's tackles were deliberate.

You sound like us with our conspiracy theorises.

The unmitiagted fact of the matter is that Adam is a big fat ****ing fraud of a footballer who is so **** and slow that even when he tries to tackle a player they've usually already gone past him and he misses the ball and gets their legs instead. The proof of this is that nearly every game he gets a yellow for a ****e tackle in midfield.

There's plenty of times he doesn't even look at the ball, focusing on the player. It's not like he's the only one to do that - Cattermole is another "fine" example of a player who goes for the player rather than the ball, for example. Besides, saying it's because he's slow isn't sufficient - Huddlestone is slow and he doesn't clatter players, whilst Terry makes up for his lack of pace by racially abusing the opponent...
 
What part of your imagination did you dredge that fantasy up from?
The only link to anything like that on a quick Google search appeared to be from The Sun. Should you be reading that?

It was common knowledge and that 'info' came from JJetset and the a second time from Rodger's own mouth.

If you didn't know that Rodger's to Spurs was basically a done deal then you can't be much of a Spurs fan.

Hell, even a quick chat with the Swans supporters would reveal that.

Even more controversial was Levy still talking to Rodger's after he'd told LFC he'd take the job to try and see if there was any chance he'd changed his mind, and that is also something Rodger's has told people.

I don't expect any of you to believe that but if you knew where both of these came from you might think different. But one day it might turn up in a Spurs/Swansea/Liverpool related autobiography and then, whenever that may be, you can read it think; "that lad on Not606 all those years ago was right after all".

At the very very least nearly all Spurs fans have spoke to on the other forums have agreed that it was accepted he was the primary target until Redknapp didn't get the England job.
 
There's plenty of times he doesn't even look at the ball, focusing on the player. It's not like he's the only one to do that - Cattermole is another "fine" example of a player who goes for the player rather than the ball, for example. Besides, saying it's because he's slow isn't sufficient - Huddlestone is slow and he doesn't clatter players, whilst Terry makes up for his lack of pace by racially abusing the opponent...

Talking of centre halves isn't it funny that Neil Ruddock only turned into a raving xenophobe when he went to Anfield..........