My BIGGEST disappointment was a 20 year old Macallan single malt! It had been stored in sherry oak casks and the taste of sherry completely dominated! Since then I've never gone past a 10 year old, with my favourite being Bruich Laddich!
Let's hope he doesn't get to grab it - we might even get some coming our way!! It's all a great shame but we don't know the ins & outs so cannot really comment with authority. If Paul Lambert loses though, his reputation will be diminished in football circles which will be the last thing he wants.
Surely the consequences for our Club could be equally dire if we lose. If we had just let him go to Villa we would have got £2m in compensation or so the story goes. If we lose our case and Villa/Lambert win we will have to pay £2m and the immense legal costs meaning an overall loss of up to £5m. If the decisions were made by the Chairman and Chief Exec - and we do not know if they were - would they still keep the confidence of the owners and the shareholders? Would the Chairman, in particular, feel that he had no option but to resign?
Ignored this threadi for a couple of days. Odd how people generally disagreed with me but seemed to have turned a corner and most are sayi g they are grateful for what Lambert dish for the club.
Surely there can be no doubt that he was "brew yint" at giving us a hand, but he's been a bit of a dick since his departure!
That's what I was great for us but since he has left his wanting to sue the club isn't good. But that's not going to stop me appreciate what he has done fr the club.
I never said that I didn't appriciate what he did for the club, that was then and this is now, and as far as I'm concerned to try to get the fans of the club he abandoned on his side is diabolical.
If it was going to cost us £3m to defend £2m, I think we'd settle out of court, it's effectively risking an extra signing next summer.
