I was referring to the "real Norwich fan" bit of you comment. These people are not "Real fans"
Untitled
- Thread starter Superman wears Grant Holt pyjamas in bed
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I was referring to the "real Norwich fan" bit of you comment. These people are not "Real fans"
I was referring to the "real Norwich fan" bit of you comment. These people are not "Real fans"
Agreed, even of they think they are.
I always find it amazing that fans rage in a situation like this and allow their feelings to boil over. I'll freak out when it warrants it but at the end of the Newcastle game I didn't have the urge to phone canary call and just got ape-**** with metal comments. I was disappointed, but philosophical.
It's unfair that some fans need babying and reassurance all the time just to prevent them from raging like a baby girl in tescos that hasn't got a lollipop.
It is all just a little immature with me, you have to work out problems not flip out. These people are the ones that flip the board in monopoly when they are losing. Pathetic creatures.
They could be real fans, just foolish ones. Just defending those that are less able to defend themselves
Exactly. What's happening isn't a disaster so don't go for an extreme option such as sack the manager. Go for the cheaper not so risky option first. If the situation gets worse go for a slightly more risky option.
These people are looking for an immediate solution so they jump the gun. It takes time. These people also don't realise the risks that come with certain 'solutions' so they end up wondering why, for example, the manager hasn't been sacked yet. Sometimes spending the money to sack a manager and hiring a new manager isn't worth it. Especially when the problems are minor. By all means sack the manager if you go twenty games without getting a point, that is a disaster and perhaps a necessary action but don't sack the manager who has only picked up five points in the first ten games. Maybe that situation requires fiddling with the starting XI a bit or practicing shooting/defending in training more but it certainly doesn't require a new manager.
Note that what I say above is all hypothetical and I hope I made sense.