Welbeck dived repeatedly in that game.
Scholes also made a number of very dodgy challenges.
I'm completely unsurprised that they escaped without punishment, though.
has Scoles ever made a good challenge?

Welbeck dived repeatedly in that game.
Scholes also made a number of very dodgy challenges.
I'm completely unsurprised that they escaped without punishment, though.

Bogus! ???...Au contraire Mr. Spurf!
Chelsea - Ancellotti did their first double not JM, plus I'm not suggesting winning the league, only CL Qual.
The goons and uniteds managerial position does help agreed, but they still dealt with team overhauls without dropping too much.
And had the Chavs not got CL by default, or the goons with one man show RVP, I can't see their fans being accepting of less...unlike the Scousers whose predicament you conveniently chose not to comment on!
Bogus!...![]()
Don't forget to call his argument BOGUS Bajan.![]()
It's not too late to come to the light and leave the dark side....![]()

You are both more than entitled to ignore the fact other clubs have had a far more positive approach having had similar issues. You're also more than welcome to regard my view as bogus, seems only fair as I regard yours as I would a hankerchief full of bogies!![]()
So my argument is consigned to the bin marked bogies, ok! You can continue to ignore the realities and adopt a Holte like position, your choice, but boguososity wins nowt! 
I am all for a positive approach, I see you are now trying to claim the high ground.So my argument is consigned to the bin marked bogies, ok! You can continue to ignore the realities and adopt a Holte like position, your choice, but boguososity wins nowt!
![]()

Not really Spurf, I'm not doing anything now, that I haven't said from the off, so suddenly claiming high ground now isn't right. Neither did I realise we were arguing. My only point in all of this, is that other clubs, have had similar instances, United and L'Arse have not had managerial change, but I don't want to separate them just because of that, both have totally rebuilt sides more than once, without being accepting of dropping out of contention. Chelsea have had numerous managerial upheavals, and followed up with trophy/ies. So why should Spurs be acpeting of finishing 6th, we haven't for a few yrs. As I have stated Liverpool to me are an example of such an attiude, just my opinion.![]()
or if you prefer a discussion. 

If you include an 'as long as you spend billions on your squad' clause, then I'd agree with you, Notso!

Late 90's to 04 was without Abramovich's wallet, so I think my point is still valid.![]()
Yep PNP is right so it's BOGUS because we don't have the same level of funding and don't bring pre Abramovich days in to it either.
Dropping from first to 4th is = to us dropping 4th to 7thThat's 3 places.
Agree now!![]()
Err!...that didn't happen...ever....and I never said it did, I clearly said they 'maintained' their 4th/5th league finishes then...not 6th. You've pulled out another great big gritty bogey!![]()
They finished 6th in both 2000/01 and 01/02, Notso.

I think we are close to a consensus. Top 6 is acceptable, lower is underachievement, but 4 or 5 is where this squad should finish. So whereas 5 would have been a step back with Harry, 5 with AVB will be ok provided we see the signs through the season that we are improving, then next season we expect more than we could have expected with Harry. Plus a cup win would be considered an acceptable if not even welcome improvement.
Can we all more or less agree with that?