**calling all gooners**

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
i got banned for having DB's quote on my sig, "Saying stop being so fickle and keep the faith", Chatting on the LC for a bit, and one post. NO WARNINGS 3 Non-Rule Breaking Posts and I got banned.
 
Ammaar said:
Didn't you have a picture with van Persie and the word **** on it? Even if you believe that to be true, my understanding is that it was offensive and someone had actually complained about it - you refused to take it down.


You were getting heated in some discussions - particularly in my 13 paged thread 'American Citizens and Militant Weaponry' where half of the posts in the threads included digs.



Really? Is that so? Then why was HE banned from here? If he couldn't deal with the responses, he could have easily just stopped replying to you and stopped posting on the site altogether. Yet instead he got banned.

That doesn't sound like he couldn't handle the responses....just saying.
Click to expand...

Ammaar, I think you've been led up the garden path by your friends on the other forum.

The RVP picture I posted was in a thread with other funny photoshopped captions. It had a picture of RVP with Fellani's hair and Fergie saying 'I've got you the hair, now play like that you dutch ****' right after Utd lost to Everton. Anyone with half a brain cell could see that it was a tounge in cheek post, on a tounge in cheek thread. A couple of your posters even had a laugh about it with me. Ever heard of a sense of humour ?

It wasn't in my sig, nobody complained about it to me, nobody asked me to remove it - and so I didn't refuse to do anything. That I'm afraid is your friend Jamrag and RvB making **** up

The American weaponry thread was a decent thread. I didn't agree with Jamrag saying that allowing people to be armed would reduce road rage incidents because people would be scared that they'd get their heads blown off - I thought that was a stupid view to be honest. But I didn't abuse him for it, even though it probably justified it. It may have been a heated discussion, but it's a controversial topic. What do you want on there ? A nice sanitised view where you all agree with each other ? Because that's what you've got currently.

As for Jamrag getting banned. He knows full well why he got banned from here. As for him choosing not to reply to me or not to post here ? Do me a favour Ammaar, he was the worst one for endlessly dragging out spats on here. In the end he got into a spat with Syd, and Syd ****ed him off permanently <ok>
 
Ammaar said:
Right, so why would Piskie be banned from the site for quoting Bergkamp, if the quote is on the actual forum itself? That would just totally defy logic.



Fair enough, but you need to understand that things are said bourne out of frustration and anguish. I'll admit that at times I can be reactionary, but Piskie's comments have been unfair IMO. Like I said - if everyone was only allowed to subscribe to the same mantra in order to join the site, then Piskie would have been banned in a matter of minutes. Yet he was given warnings when he was out of place, which he didn't acknowledge, and was allowed to post 100 times on the site.



Another lie, Cym....

How would you know about BADM's signature on Arsenaltalk if you thought you had to be a member to look at the site? <doh>

Idiot.
Click to expand...
You know why i know so much about what's going on on that forum ;)
Don't worry your secret is safe with me and the other lads <ok>
Stop being so nasty Park <cry>
 
Ammaar said:
Aaaah, I see what you're talking about now. My bad.


Nevertheless, it was fair enough that he got banned if the intention was to wum....
Click to expand...

I see that you're starting to understand that what Jamrag tells you isn't the full picture. . . you're learning <ok>

Intention to wum ? - I'd made a hundred posts and contributed good content to the threads, even BADM congratulated me for creating 'great debate'

I got banned because Jamrag and RvB couldn't handle Dennis Bergkamp's quote about trophies, because it was the player they admire the most challenging their pessimistic view of Arsenal.

That is the truth I'm afraid Ammaar, you might not like it, but that's how it is.
 
COYG said:
I often miss Jamrag...


Must get closer next time I take a shot :)
Click to expand...

I wonder what life would have been like for him if he'd had enough oxygen at birth.

Give him credit though, he doesn't know the meaning of the word fear, but then again he doesn't
know the meaning of most words.

I like him. People say I've no taste, but I like him.
 
Jay ram clearly had an agenda and hated the fact that people would not agree with his views. Hence the reason he would try and belittle people that did not agree with him. The guy then set up his own forum, made himself a moderator and only recruited people who agreed with his views, if that's not power hungry I don't know what is, the fact that he has banned the only two people to join the forum that disagreed with him pretty much supports the fact that he can't take it when someone dares to disagree with him.
 
Ammaar said:
If someone had complained about it and the mods requested you to take it down, you should have adhered to the rules. There have been instances on here where I thought I've said things that are tongue in cheek but have been told from either you or Cym to refrain from doing such and such. You should follow the same guidelines when you're on an alternative forum where you have little control over how it should be run.




How do I know you're not lying? It's not exactly been the first time Piskie...



I didn't agree with Jayram either in that thread and made it clear, yet whenever we've been in a debate, we've never resorted to profanities or insults.

I've disagreed with Jayram on other topics too. I've disagreed with him over how much control Wenger has at Arsenal, I've disagreed with Jayram over how much Wenger is culpable for for the lack of success over the past eight years, I've disagreed with Jayram about certain players like Gervinho, Wilshere, Sagna - yet me and him have never once been involved in a spat, either on not606 when he had an account or on there.



So that means he could reply back to the responses that he got which differed from his own.



Cym - you're a ****er. Plain and simple. You even have the nerve to lie to me in PM's as well. It's beyond pathetic.
Click to expand...
I hope your mummy and daddy don't know your using naughty words on the internet.There again maybe they're the sort of parents who don't care how you behave yourself.
You keep on accusing me of lying to you,but you are unable to provide any evidence or proof.I gave you the opportunity by PM earlier but to no avail.I presume you are familiar with the saying "put up or shut up" ;)
 
Ammaar said:
If someone had complained about it and the mods requested you to take it down, you should have adhered to the rules.

How do I know you're not lying? It's not exactly been the first time Piskie...

I didn't agree with Jayram either in that thread and made it clear, yet whenever we've been in a debate, we've never resorted to profanities or insults.

So that means he could reply back to the responses that he got which differed from his own.
Click to expand...

Sorry Ammaar, but for a forum that claims to uphold the values of free speech, the mods forcibly removing a quote from Dennis Bergkamp is unbelievably hypocritcal and extremely weak willed.

How do you know I'm not lying about the RVP pic ? Fortunately for Jamrag, he's banned my IP so I can't get access to my inbox, if I did, I'd post the evidence here for you to read about how they forcibly removed the Dennis Bergkamp quote.

I didn't resort to insults either in the Weaponry thread, in fact BADM congratulated me on creating a 'great debate'.

Jamrag was always free to post his views and responses on here. Contrary to the claim that he was censored and denied a view, he was always allowed to share his opinion, he might not have like the responses he got, but tough titties, what did he expect? a nice sugar coated reply ?

The only evidence of censorship and denial of a view that has happened is on arsenaltalk, the blatant denial of allowing me to express my opinion via Dennis Bergkamp's quote and my subsequent banning for it - is the most hypocritical example I've ever come across.

Your friends on there Ammaar claim to be the injured party, but they are guilty of everything that they accused the mods of here doing. You might not want to see it, but it's the truth mate <ok>
 
I'm sorry Amaar but I was actually willing to give the place a chance despite the overwhelming negativity. But of course see a familiar non Wenger out name and ban him with no warning.
 
Anyway Ammaar, thanks for keeping me in the loop as to what's happening on arsenaltalk. My IP is banned so I can't even view the forum. It's good to know that you're still willing to share information with us, so thanks <ok>
 
Ammaar said:
No, you came to WUM. You said that on here before you registered and one of the members on the site found you out.

I myself have no qualms with you Oxocube - but if you're there to wind people up, then really, it's not going to end in anything other than a ban, is it?
Click to expand...

Grow up and man up. It's a forum. If you can't take a wind up, then don't go on a public forum.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back