ANOther - In terms of what he was bought for and what he delivered, Bent wins hands down. Of the ones still here, I find it difficult to say when we've two S. American internationals we've hardly seen yet and a classy Ghanaian LW we've never seen on the LW yet.
Few of those are young lads with potential so tricky to judge them yet without full seasons etc. Has to be Gyan for his ten goals in his first season and not playing a quarter of the season.
Mag in peace, voted for Turner but considered Gyan. If you lot get relegated I'd have both of them, ta
We paid around ã4m around the same time that Liverpool paid around ã17.5m for Glen Johnson, ã17m plus clauses for Alberto Aquilani and around ã2m for Sotirios Kyrgiakos. Couldn't afford him... hahahaha
In terms of bargains then it has to be Bramble. Outstanding deal pulled off there. In terms of quality and potential for me it's Gyan. For pure goalscoring ability it's got to be Bent.
Wont vote, Bruce could buy Messi, and play him out of position, so therefore, you cant get a true definition of the player.
bent easily, no one on that list can touch him, it's all opinions but how any one can compare gyan to bent is beyond me.
they couldnt, they used the alonso money for johnson and god knows what for aquilani. Kyriagos was bought at the same time and was cheaper than Turner so they had to settle for him, they were in a bidding war with celtic
