I don't know what you're talking aboutSort of like when you take a dig at every single one of my comments?

But bringing it into other threads? Did he sleep with your sister or something?
I don't know what you're talking aboutSort of like when you take a dig at every single one of my comments?

I don't know what you're talking about
But bringing it into other threads? Did he sleep with your sister or something?
My sister can sleep with whoever she wants.
Can I have her number?

No the pointlessly abusive nature of it is what makes it objectionable, especially when it's just for expressing an opinion. But since you ask, having a go at someone in a thread they're not even involved in seems a bit spiteful, yeah.
The word "abusive" in there is a bit strong don't you think? Have you forgotten that this is merely a website where we are all nothing but anonymous passages of text? There are no personal insults, mainly because you have to actually know someone personally to do that, and if you actually get offended on here then I suggest you grow thicker skin or log out. If I thought I was offending or upsetting Alan in some way, then obviously I would ease up because I'm not a complete dick, and it's not my intent, but I think he has shown that he is more than capable of holding his own, even if I don't agree with his retorts, and certainly doesn't need you fighting his battles for him.
How did today's press conference go?
Phillips, Dann and Davies announced
Maybe 'abusive' is a bit strong, but there is a certain tone to the things you say that isn't really required. Calling his argument 'absurd' and telling him he's not listening, for example, are not necessary. It's not really a question of whether or not he finds it offensive or upsetting, it lowers the tone of debate for everyone. Not to mention it leads to off-topic rubbish like this that people don't care much for.
Anyway, that's just my opinion, so don't hold back now![]()
Not Fierro? Missed a trick there!