The FA have charged John Terry

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Drogs said:
and why's that?



This. Spineless ****s.

They had something to fall back on due to the verdict of the court case, now Chelsea will want valid answers and so will our fans.
Click to expand...

Think without your Chelsea hat on, the Suarez case was very debatable... there is, in this instance, clear evidence, and no, Terry's language didn't mean something else in Uruguay...
 
I was under the impression (due to the court cases verdict) that charging Terry means Anton also has to go down with him? FA = joke.
 
NI Revolution In Red said:
Think without your Chelsea hat on, the Suarez case was very debatable... there is, in this instance, clear evidence, and no, Terry's language didn't mean something else in Uruguay...
Click to expand...

I would have to ask you to think without your Liverpool hat on, Terry was found NOT GUILTY in a court of law with a plausible excuse for uttering the words he is accused of.
 
NI Revolution In Red said:
Think without your Chelsea hat on, the Suarez case was very debatable... there is, in this instance, clear evidence, and no, Terry's language didn't mean something else in Uruguay...
Click to expand...

What clear evidence? And what does this have to do with Uruguay? Every time a Liverpool fan tries to compare this to the Evra-Suarez incident they make a mockery of themselves.
 
The FA have to tread carefully. If they charge Terry for using racist language then they are going against a court of law therefore making them look even more ridiculous than the already are, and if they charge him for bringing the game into disrepute then Anton will have to be banned as well because I don't think Terry's outburst was unprovoaked. FA are digging themselves a hole...
 
If Anton is also charged then so be it, it just makes it look petty. But to charge JT only is ****ing ludicrous.
 
Yurilly said:
What clear evidence? And what does this have to do with Uruguay? Every time a Liverpool fan tries to compare this to the Evra-Suarez incident they make a mockery of themselves.
Click to expand...

The Uruguay reference was tongue in cheek <doh>

... Video evidence.

Also, there is a misconception that being found not guilty is the same thing as being truly innocent. It's not, and if you don't know the difference, well...

If Anton is also charged then so be it, it just makes it look petty. But to charge JT only is ****ing ludicrous.
Click to expand...

True. Rio should probably be fined for bringing the game into disrepute or some symbolic charge for those tweets, also.
 
Varier2 said:
The FA have to tread carefully. If they charge Terry for using racist language then they are going against a court of law therefore making them look even more ridiculous than the already are, and if they charge him for bringing the game into disrepute then Anton will have to be banned as well because I don't think Terry's outburst was unprovoaked. FA are digging themselves a hole...
Click to expand...

A court of law judges on if Racist language was used with intent which couldnt be properly proved.
FA charge if the language has been used at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back