eeekk!!!!!! New Banner

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Probably the old page/image is cached somewhere for speedier loading. Try refreshing the page several times. <ok>

Yeah, figured it out eventually. Looks alright to me - not exactly HD quality but fits the space very nicely.
 
Maltese says the image is pixelated because it wasn't the minimum 1800 px width; but Dave says that while the first image sent to Mick wasn't 1800 px, an 1800 px "original" was sent later. That suggests that the current banner is a stretched version of the first image sent to Mick, i.e. the 1600 px image (or whatever it was), not the later 1800 px one?

No, I think someone has made the original and then stretched it upwards to fit the resolution - I rejected the first one because it had been downscaled, and I didn't want to stretch it up to fit as it would have given the similar blurry effect.
 
Yeah looks pretty blurred to me too. Nothing major but is a shame because I remember it looking pretty good when you all had the vote on which one to use.
 
No, I think someone has made the original and then stretched it upwards to fit the resolution - I rejected the first one because it had been downscaled, and I didn't want to stretch it up to fit as it would have given the similar blurry effect.

<ok> Mick.
 
Um, what about the headless canary? I can see a lot of headless chicken jokes coming our way. <yikes>
 
No, I think someone has made the original and then stretched it upwards to fit the resolution - I rejected the first one because it had been downscaled, and I didn't want to stretch it up to fit as it would have given the similar blurry effect.

I made the banner and the original was 1800 px, it was never stretched by me, unfortunately when it was put on here for everyone to see the site automatically resized it, I have the original saved on my computer (I'm away from home on my laptop this evening) if you can let me have your e-mail Maltese I can send you the correct one.
 
I made the banner and the original was 1800 px, it was never stretched by me, unfortunately when it was put on here for everyone to see the site automatically resized it, I have the original saved on my computer (I'm away from home on my laptop this evening) if you can let me have your e-mail Maltese I can send you the correct one.


Sort out the near touchline perspective while your at it!

<ok>
 
I made the banner and the original was 1800 px, it was never stretched by me, unfortunately when it was put on here for everyone to see the site automatically resized it, I have the original saved on my computer (I'm away from home on my laptop this evening) if you can let me have your e-mail Maltese I can send you the correct one.

Harry, the email is [email protected]

<ok>
 
Yeah right...

it's a poor photoshop job, the angles/vanishing points are all wrong!!


<laugh><laugh><laugh>

That's a bit rich welly! You're on the Norwich board, criticizing a Norwich banner, chosen by Norwich fans from a selection of designs by a Norwich fan, when Ipswich haven't even got a banner!

I think you're out of order sir!
 
That's a bit rich welly! You're on the Norwich board, criticizing a Norwich banner, chosen by Norwich fans from a selection of designs by a Norwich fan, when Ipswich haven't even got a banner!

I think you're out of order sir!


Only constructive criticism, Dave, but the vanishing points are all wrong!

<ok>