I know, obviously messageboards are good for spreading the word and the banter,but like anything there is alway's negative drawbacks,it's learning to see through the bullshit I suppose........
Welcome on board BTW

I know, obviously messageboards are good for spreading the word and the banter,but like anything there is alway's negative drawbacks,it's learning to see through the bullshit I suppose........

I didn't see him disinterested ... he had a job to do by defending from the front and putting himself about, linking up any counter attacks ... Please remember that MH was trying first to become difficult to beat ..I could certainly see the improvement, the concentration and discipline improve game by game... its not about running about wildly. There is so much more to his role and his game that goes unnoticed...and his role was different in each game ... Bob? if you read this please help them out here. BZ would have been very aware of every thing he needed to do.Yeah he was awful and disinterested in a couple games, but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.
I'm good like that![]()
Can I also remind the bashers, that 3 seasons ago most talked about HH in the same tone people talk about Hulse today. He couldn't do a thing right for us, but look how he's played for the past couple of seasons.
Give Zamora a chance, because if he becomes settled then he's a very dangerous forward to have. Let's try and be positive about our players for a change and hope for the best, rather than expecting the worst.
We need to give all our players a clean slate for the new season and get behind them 101%
Yeah he was awful and disinterested in a couple games, but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.
I'm good like that![]()
That's what I'm hearing as well.Im giving him the benefit of the doubt like I did with HH before he went to Watford on loan. I told everyone he would come good as I believed he was injured and seemed lazy because you dont chase lost causes when you are in pain.
That why Ill let a couple of lazy performances go from Zamora as he could have been playing through something.
Im giving him the benefit of the doubt like I did with HH before he went to Watford on loan. I told everyone he would come good as I believed he was injured and seemed lazy because you dont chase lost causes when you are in pain.
That why Ill let a couple of lazy performances go from Zamora as he could have been playing through something.
Inconsistent, went from outstanding to awful.
We could have had Jelavic instead, mistake.
If we had a choice between Jelavic and Zamora, we made a mistake (with the benefit of hindsight of course).
Sometimes it is necessary not to chase lost causes I have never under stood this its part of the English game which is laughable and we still call it lazy!
Zamora and Jelavic are two completely different players.

If we had a choice between Jelavic and Zamora, we made a mistake (with the benefit of hindsight of course).
I think Rangers owed Everton some money which essentially gave them first dibs on Jelavic (and meant they got him pretty cheaply too).
It's true Kerry we could have had him.