Clyde Statement on 13th July Meeting

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Tioga River

Member
Mar 22, 2012
735
7
18
Further proof (if any was needed) of the underhandedness of this debacle


http://www.clydefc.co.uk/statement.html


The Board of Clyde Football Club has received the papers in advance of tomorrows SFL meeting and will consider the Heads of Terms supplied. We continue to have the same fundamental concerns about this process, however the overriding concern is a point which we have made to the SFL.


We have received absolutely no information on the organisation Sevco Scotland Ltd whom we are being asked, and encouraged, to vote straight into the top division of the SFL under resolution 2 and possibly into SFL 3 under Resolution 1. We have no business plan, list of directors, details of ownership, statement of capital adequacy or any proposals relating to the provision of any similar information in the near future.
David Longmuir has clearly stated that he will distribute all the information he has got or is able to distribute.


Whilst the notion that there is a leap of faith to be taken in terms of some of the matters,
there can be no leap of faith with something as fundamental as knowing who is being admitted to the league. The very fact that there is no information of any kind being made available on this company undermines the authorities efforts to direct the new entrant to SFL 1. It is actually impossible for any member of the SFL to make an objective assessment of the proposals under Resolutions 1 and 2 and could be seen as irresponsible to support either proposal in such a void of information.

It is our hope that some credibility can be introduced to this process and we would ask that whoever holds information on Sevco Scotland Ltd provides a full and detailed pack to David Longmuir in order that even at the eleventh hour the SFL clubs are given reason to support any Resolutions that they might wish to vote on. We have to assume that the SFA and SPL hold such information otherwise they would not press so heavily for entry to SFL 1.

If a leap of faith is to be taken, then in the current circumstances it will be taken blindly and the only logical outcome of taking that kind of risk would be to enter them to SFL 3, where, should any subsequent issues arise they will be contained within the lowest league rather than disrupting the top flight of the SFL.

The other matter that is entirely outside the gift of the SFL is the need for the SPL clubs to confirm that contrary to what Neil Doncaster stated on their behalf, the SPL will meet its obligations to the SFL under the Settlement Agreement.
 
But... but... but.....don't Clyde realise if they don't vote YES then Scottish Football is DOOMED, Doomed I tells ya.

Seems the SFL chairmen aren't as daft (or as easy to bully) as the SFA and SPL were banking on. <laugh>
 
Seems the SFL chairmen aren't as daft (or as easy to bully) as the SFA and SPL were banking on.

Regan and Doncaster are finished as far as i'm concerned. They have taken it upon themselves to convince everyone what they alone seem to believe, and as you say, no one (apart from a few) are stupid enough to fall for the parcel of ****e they are trying desperately to offload.

Rangers (Or Green) are not behind these laughable attempts at scaremongering and bribery, I just feel that Regan and Doncaster are buying into their own myths for some reason.

When this is all over, wherever Rangers end up, these two morons should be ridden out of Glasgow on a ****ing rail.
 
Seems the SFL chairmen aren't as daft (or as easy to bully) as the SFA and SPL were banking on.


If the suggestion here is true and the basic information on sevco is not forthcoming i envisage a scenario where the first question is voted down and that deems the second question irrelevant

Ibrox 2012/13 - The Most Popular Concert Venue in Scotland <ok>
 
If the suggestion here is true and the basic information on sevco is not forthcoming i envisage a scenario where the first question is voted down and that deems the second question irrelevant

Ibrox 2012/13 - The Most Popular Concert Venue in Scotland

Or as someone suggested the other day (maybe it was you?) , it's a perfect venue for all those Orange Parades, keep those besashed ****wits off the strets.
 
Regan and Doncaster are finished as far as i'm concerned. They have taken it upon themselves to convince everyone what they alone seem to believe, and as you say, no one (apart from a few) are stupid enough to fall for the parcel of ****e they are trying desperately to offload.

Rangers (Or Green) are not behind these laughable attempts at scaremongering and bribery, I just feel that Regan and Doncaster are buying into their own myths for some reason.

When this is all over, wherever Rangers end up, these two morons should be ridden out of Glasgow on a ****ing rail.

Totally agree.

It's about to blow up in their faces big time. The SFL are gonny call them on their SPL2 threat. Then what's going to happen? No way that can be set up in time for this season so we'll either be in Div3 or on hiatus for a season. Either way it's Regan's "armageddon" <laugh>
 
Or as someone suggested the other day (maybe it was you?) , it's a perfect venue for all those Orange Parades, keep those besashed ****wits off the strets.


Wasn't me but I do see the logic in that - might even be lucky enough to get someone to plant a few ounces of c-4, that'd really get the place rocking
 
Dug racing for a season. <ok>

Not greyhounds or whippets, that's whit Shawfield is for. Na, we'll do devil dug racing. Instead of a rabbit we'll have a tim in the hoops running for his life.

Hours of family entertainment.
 
Tioga River:3124520 said:
Or as someone suggested the other day (maybe it was you?) , it's a perfect venue for all those Orange Parades, keep those besashed ****wits off the strets.


Wasn't me but I do see the logic in that - might even be lucky enough to get someone to plant a few ounces of c-4, that'd really get the place rocking

It was me

Sometimes I feel invisible
 
Dug racing for a season. <ok>

Not greyhounds or whippets, that's whit Shawfield is for. Na, we'll do devil dug racing. Instead of a rabbit we'll have a tim in the hoops running for his life.

Hours of family entertainment.

<laugh><laugh>

Ya bestart ye <grr>
 
Here's the proposals as sent to SFL clubs on Wednesday

http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/...l-clubs-to-allow-rangers-into-first-division/

A) In the event that Sevco Scotland Limited is admitted as Associate Member of Scottish Football League and that Rangers FC shall be directed to play in the First Division of the SFL during season 2012/13 by resolutions approved by general meeting by SFL on Friday 13th July, then the following are to be implemented.

Subject to The Rangers FC plc (in administration) signing a stock transfer in favour of Dundee or Dunfermline FC, a resolution will be tabled to a general meeting of the SPL to approve the registration of the transfer of that share.

A payment of a minimum of £1 million + VAT will be made by the SPL to SFL to purchase the broadcasting and other rights in respect of SFL Division One next season.

A resolution will be tabled to a general meeting to allow for play-offs at end of season 2012/13.

A working party will be formed, including three representatives from both the SPL and SFL, to devise a new structure for the senior professional game in Scotland.

a) The introduction of an enlarged top tier for Scottish Senior Professional Football.

b) A new detailed model for senior professional football in Scotland including number of divisions; number of clubs per division; number of matches per season per division; number of promotion and relegation places per division and the introduction and operation of play-offs.

c)

I) A combined rule book

II) Governance recognising that one league body should have a chairman and two non-executive directors (to be appointed by the board and nominated by a panel with equal representation between i. the top division and ii. the other divisions). Three directors elected by clubs in top division and two directors elected by clubs in remaining divisions.

III) In the event that any change to the rules has any bearing on position rights, divisional structure including promotion and relegation, then any change would require the support of 75% outside of top tier of football clubs.

IV) An all through distribution model, providing certainty for all clubs as to the percentage of distributable income that would be received.

V) An integrated executive.

d) The introduction of a pyramid for Scottish football to provide a route for licensed clubs to enter the new structure effective 2014/2015.

e) The value and number of parachute payments to be made across the new structure.

f) The Scottish FA to invest in a restructuring budget to facilitate the delivery of the above domestic structure.

In the event that a final decision is not reached by 30th November 2012, the Scottish FA will seek to implement a new structure in time for the 2013/2014 season. The members of the working party including Chairman will be announced in the near future and will ensure consultation with all stakeholders prior to final recommendations being made.

These heads of terms are not intended to be a contractual agreement which is legally binding between the parties.