In 5 years time.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Im with wisescummer on this one, I've always been a pessimist/realist whatever you want to call it when it comes to Saints. I wouldn't be surprised if the Liebherrs got us established as a solid Prem team then sold us on when they see their ROI as good enough. Would still be very happy and have no complaints about it if it were to happen as they saved us and would have taken us further than most could of dreamt of.

If they want to sell, fine, Nicola has said he'd be prepared for that and would be able to find new people to invest. Cortese leaving would be far more damaging than the Liebherrs.
 
No, it's not. My definition of spending is trading at a loss in the transfer market. If somebody sells a house for £5 million and buys one for £1 million, he has bought an expensive house, but I wouldn't say he was a particularly big spender.

SS, I know Nicola said that, but to quote Christine Keeler, 'well he would wouldn't he'. When CSI went into administration, didn't Lampitt say something about there being no risk to the club? Haven't numerous chairmen in the past said that the 'the manager has my 100% backing'. Now I'm not saying Nicola is lying, but it's a proven fact that chairmen of football clubs lie, so I don't consider what he says to be conclusive proof. Now doubt i'll get shot down in flames for this.

Good night, i'll check on the veritable **** storm in the morning.

I am so terribly sorry that I didnt have a crystal ball and read your definition of spending more or less. FFS, you wrote "spending less heavily". Goodness knows how I mis-interpreted that.
 
No, it's not. My definition of spending is trading at a loss in the transfer market. If somebody sells a house for £5 million and buys one for £1 million, he has bought an expensive house, but I wouldn't say he was a particularly big spender.

SS, I know Nicola said that, but to quote Christine Keeler, 'well he would wouldn't he'. When CSI went into administration, didn't Lampitt say something about there being no risk to the club? Haven't numerous chairmen in the past said that the 'the manager has my 100% backing'. Now I'm not saying Nicola is lying, but it's a proven fact that chairmen of football clubs lie, so I don't consider what he says to be conclusive proof. Now doubt i'll get shot down in flames for this.

Good night, i'll check on the veritable **** storm in the morning.

I am so terribly sorry that I didnt have a crystal ball and read your definition of spending more or less. FFS, you wrote "we haven't spent as heavily". Goodness knows how I mis-interpreted that. Perhaps you should have explained, then I wouldn't have to apply a full Fiscal thought process to your remark.


On your NC comments, you have a fair point. I actually asked him what would happen if someone came along with a wad of cash to buy the club. We must remember that he is a driven careeer man with a lot of ability in the business and financial world who may be tempted or sought after by someone else. I would be confident however that he would leave us financially sound.
 
Can't remember where I read it now, but Markus gave instructions to his executors about Saints and how much we meant to him. Executors usually try and carry out such wishes. I don't think that we mean anything like as much to his heirs as we did to Markus, but do you remember the adoring look of his daughter at him when we won the JPT and she saw how happy he was. We think of Markus whenever something good happens to us and I suspect so do his family. Nothing is for ever, but the Leihberrs aren't on their uppers so think we are safe for a while yet.
 
I am so terribly sorry that I didnt have a crystal ball and read your definition of spending more or less. FFS, you wrote "we haven't spent as heavily". Goodness knows how I mis-interpreted that. Perhaps you should have explained, then I wouldn't have to apply a full Fiscal thought process to your remark.


On your NC comments, you have a fair point. I actually asked him what would happen if someone came along with a wad of cash to buy the club. We must remember that he is a driven careeer man with a lot of ability in the business and financial world who may be tempted or sought after by someone else. I would be confident however that he would leave us financially sound.

Well he was sought after by AC Milan and didn't leave, I have faith in him :D
 
In a cynical world the happy man is indeed a wise man.
The cynical man worries about all the bad things that might happen.
His only joy is saying "I told you so" when one of them does.
The wise man knows that many things may happen and accepts it.

Wisescummer? Unhappyscummer?
 
Quite frankly you should be glad we are having such an involved discussion on your thread. Every post gives you points.
 
I think ThatThereSaintsFan is after a return to his original thread idea, but I have to say that this difference in opinion is much more interesting. I didn't realise we had people left with such fundamental doubts about the present Owners and Chairman. I guess being a dyed-in-the-wool, old style Saints fan takes some shaking off.

Let's remember this conversation, and see if our judgements ring true. By the way, in 46 years of watching Saints, I've long since stopped being overly optimistic on the Club, so my point of view takes some belief. This isn't the same Saints we've known and loved all our lives. ;)