SPL for me

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
StereoTypist said:
Humped out of Europe twice in a couple of weeks, Mark Daly all but proving that your owner Whyte was a crook, watching 5th-rate players turn up for trials in January then leaving on the same day, being placed into administration, selling your best player for buttons, other players being forced to take massive wage cuts, losing a 15 point lead, watching Mark Daly show all the players and other staff taking millions in "loans",winning **** all and then being liquidated.

And despite this, you still act like arrogant ****s who think Scottish football owes you a favour.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the history lesson.

Arrogant? So does that make the other clubs that will vote yes selfish money grabbing ****ers? bearing in mind Celtic are likely to vote yes and considering the other clubs are likely to turn around and arse **** you if the vote doesn't go in favor of yes.
 
StereoTypist said:
Humped out of Europe twice in a couple of weeks, Mark Daly all but proving that your owner Whyte was a crook, watching 5th-rate players turn up for trials in January then leaving on the same day, being placed into administration, selling your best player for buttons, other players being forced to take massive wage cuts, losing a 15 point lead, watching Mark Daly show all the players and other staff taking millions in "loans",winning **** all and then being liquidated.

And despite this, you still act like arrogant ****s who think Scottish football owes you a favour.
Click to expand...

Finally. Some understanding at last.
 
The Pendragon Legend said:
You think having a corner of our ground occupied by mutants twice a year outweighs this?
Click to expand...

I don't class Celtic in the needing attendances category so no I don't believe it has anything to do with your financial status and more to do with the other clubs.

I disagree with the way the money is shared and I always have, I disagreed when all the other clubs voted for some ****ey irish company to take over the TV rights just because they seen more money faster instead of a solid contract with a company no where near likely to be at risk of folding. All the other SPL clubs have never helped themselves in the financial department by making stupid decisions and now I guarantee that they are now gonna try milk money from the "Newco" just because they think they can.

My opinion is they should get ****ed.
 
Tailhook Scandal said:
Thanks for the history lesson.

Arrogant? So does that make the other clubs that will vote yes selfish money grabbing ****ers? bearing in mind Celtic are likely to vote yes and considering the other clubs are likely to turn around and arse **** you if the vote doesn't go in favor of yes.
Click to expand...

Celtic WERE likely to vote yes but I'm fairly comfortable they'll now vote no.
 
Tailhook Scandal said:
I don't class Celtic in the needing attendances category so no I don't believe it has anything to do with your financial status and more to do with the other clubs.

I disagree with the way the money is shared and I always have, I disagreed when all the other clubs voted for some ****ey irish company to take over the TV rights just because they seen more money faster instead of a solid contract with a company no where near likely to be at risk of folding. All the other SPL clubs have never helped themselves in the financial department by making stupid decisions and now I guarantee that they are now gonna try milk money from the "Newco" just because they think they can.

My opinion is they should get ****ed.
Click to expand...

<ok>

Agree with all the bits in bold.

The split after three rounds of games always confused me - I thought Celtic and Rangers were opposed to it but the voting system would've barred it if that was the case.

I know we haven't mentioned the TV money but, even though we (Celtic) get an unfair proportion of it, it is still ****ing peanuts - less than 3% of our total income.

We made about 6 years of TV money simply by selling Aiden McGeady.
 
The Pendragon Legend said:
<ok>

Agree with all the bits in bold.

The split after three rounds of games always confused me - I thought Celtic and Rangers were opposed to it but the voting system would've barred it if that was the case.

I know we haven't mentioned the TV money but, even though we (Celtic) get an unfair proportion of it, it is still ****ing peanuts - less than 3% of our total income.

We made about 6 years of TV money simply by selling Aiden McGeady.
Click to expand...

The split is quite possibly the stupidest ****ing thing in any european league (apart from that dutch european playoff thing) It's just an excuse for rangers an celtic to play 4 matches a season.

Same goes for the league restructuring vote being one of the stupidest ****ing things, how can we possibly lower the amount of teams to 10, that's just a stupid ****ing idea make a league with 16-20 teams, give the smaller teams some more money and I'm sure our league / national side wouldn't suffer from such **** football quality - which i don't think will lower if we end up in the third division, I don't think the SPL could get lower if it tried.
 
They only kept the the current spl system to get 4 old firm games ,losing them now is the time to change the whole structure . I think 16/18 team league meaning only one visit to away grounds, I would go back to two points for a win , an extra point for scoring 4 goals or more. Put Rangers the division below for one season and everybody would be happy .
 
harryhood67 said:
They only kept the the current spl system to get 4 old firm games ,losing them now is the time to change the whole structure . I think 16/18 team league meaning only one visit to away grounds, I would go back to two points for a win , an extra point for scoring 4 goals or more. Put Rangers the division below for one season and everybody would be happy .
Click to expand...

Fortunately for us you are no meaningful member of FIFA.
 
The Pendragon Legend said:
The new chairman guy suggests that Rangers fans deserve an apology but not the rest of us

Just in case you expect one

You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...


<laugh>

I suspect we'll be waiting a long, long time.

The words dignity and respect mean something entirely different to Newco.
 
Mind The Step said:
I've had yer dads hole
Click to expand...
Knew you were bent
Gambol said:
We don't need to apply. Association rules already allow transfer of SPL share to a newco at their discretion. But instead of the SFA/SPL having the balls to make a decision they're having the SPL clubs do it for them.
Click to expand...
Exactly.
StereoTypist said:
This is the most ******ed logic I've ever read.

It's like some teenage mope saying about his parents "I'll kill myself and see how they feel then!"

Fucking ******.
Click to expand...

Yeah, if the said mope came back to life 3 years later...

Who's the ******?...
The Pendragon Legend said:
Of course.

Rangers took players other clubs would've got, prize money and European tourneys other clubs would've got - if we share the cash more evenly, that's fine - I'm not comfortable with the current TV share - I think my club take an unfair share.

In the last third of this season, teams basically paid for Rangers to play.

The last old firm game at Parkhead, Celtic paid for the polis, security, ambulance service and the rest of it knowing they wouldn't get anything back.

The coefficient would've gone down without Rangers - certainly.

But, other than that, we all lost out to Rangers benefit.

Undeniable.

You think having a corner of our ground occupied by mutants twice a year outweighs this?
Click to expand...

What away teams pay for the home security?...

Think you should watch you words as recent history shows its your fans who necessitate the need for such security...

Off the top of my head...

Hugh Dallas coin tossers
AC Milan goalkeeper
Tynecastle stand security guard mash up

People in glass houses...
 
chapper said:
Knew you were bent

Exactly.


Yeah, if the said mope came back to life 3 years later...

Who's the ******?...


What away teams pay for the home security?...

Think you should watch you words as recent history shows its your fans who necessitate the need for such security...

Off the top of my head...

Hugh Dallas coin tossers
AC Milan goalkeeper
Tynecastle stand security guard mash up

People in glass houses...
Click to expand...


I didn't mention anything about the behaviour of the Rangers support - you just brought that up you OBSESSED weirdo.

I simply mentioned that other teams paid for what you should've paid - hence Dunfermline being owed so much.

If you want to get into daft tit-for-tat about fans' behaviour I would suggest that you

a) **** off to JA606
b) Stop supporting the Vandals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back