Causal fan seems intent on creating a new "Michael Laudrup" thread every 5 minutes. Can we merge all these, or delete the threads, or do something?
It's a bit ridiculous!
It's a bit ridiculous!
Can we get some control on this forum?
- Thread starter campionijack
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
THE FACTS.
These are the only Laudrup threads I can find. Did I create one every 5 minutes?
Created by me 4 June 8:43 (ORIGINAL LAUDRUP THREAD - unless I've missed one)
http://www.not606.com/showthread.ph...d-Michael-Laudrup-now-on-Swansea-City-s-radar
Created by swan_and_only 8 June 11:30
http://www.not606.com/showthread.ph...p-on-Swansea-City-s-shortlist-for-new-manager
Created by smelters 9 June 16:05
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/150580-laudrup-new-manager
Created by swan_and_only 12 June 4:02
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/150940-Michael-Laudrup-due-to-meet-Huw-Jenkins
Created by swan_and_only 12 June 20:28
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/151068-Laudrup-set-for-Swans-job
Created by valleygirl 12 June 20:28
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/151069-Sky-reporting-that-Laudrup-is-Swans-new-Manager
Created by me 13 June 6:10
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/151114-Daily-Mail-Laudrup-New-Manager-Within-Next-48-Hours
Oh, look...
3 created by swan_and_only
1 by valleygirl
1 by smelters
2 by me
My 2nd thread was created 9 days after the first one, so where do you get the idea that I'm creating Laudrup threads every 5 minutes. The only people that are created threads within minutes of other ones are valleygirl and swan_and_only.
You are pretty pathetic. You and valley belong together.
Slag me off by all means, but try to get your facts straight first.
These are the only Laudrup threads I can find. Did I create one every 5 minutes?
Created by me 4 June 8:43 (ORIGINAL LAUDRUP THREAD - unless I've missed one)
http://www.not606.com/showthread.ph...d-Michael-Laudrup-now-on-Swansea-City-s-radar
Created by swan_and_only 8 June 11:30
http://www.not606.com/showthread.ph...p-on-Swansea-City-s-shortlist-for-new-manager
Created by smelters 9 June 16:05
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/150580-laudrup-new-manager
Created by swan_and_only 12 June 4:02
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/150940-Michael-Laudrup-due-to-meet-Huw-Jenkins
Created by swan_and_only 12 June 20:28
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/151068-Laudrup-set-for-Swans-job
Created by valleygirl 12 June 20:28
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/151069-Sky-reporting-that-Laudrup-is-Swans-new-Manager
Created by me 13 June 6:10
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/151114-Daily-Mail-Laudrup-New-Manager-Within-Next-48-Hours
Oh, look...
3 created by swan_and_only
1 by valleygirl
1 by smelters
2 by me
My 2nd thread was created 9 days after the first one, so where do you get the idea that I'm creating Laudrup threads every 5 minutes. The only people that are created threads within minutes of other ones are valleygirl and swan_and_only.
You are pretty pathetic. You and valley belong together.
Slag me off by all means, but try to get your facts straight first.
Swan and only and I created a thread at exactly the same time, we are not ****ing mind readers so it will happen!
Think Rhys summed it up quite nicely really.
The reason the threads havn't been merged is because the amount of posts on each thread. If merged, posters will not only find that they will have to hunt for their post, it's going to cause a lot of confusion.
By all means, if there's to many, tell me which one you'd like to stay and I'll delete the rest!
The reason the threads havn't been merged is because the amount of posts on each thread. If merged, posters will not only find that they will have to hunt for their post, it's going to cause a lot of confusion.
By all means, if there's to many, tell me which one you'd like to stay and I'll delete the rest!
I suggest that if anyone doesn't like a particular thread that they just skip it and move onto the next one. Don't see what all the fuss is about. Everyone is free to create threads, but reading them isn't mandatory. Some of you don't seem to realise that.
Why does anyone look at Cardiff fans threads? I don't anymore. Ignore him and he'll go away soon enough.
He only turned up here again when Rodgers was on the way out and made numerous threads about that too. Always has niggling little digs at our posters too.
He only turned up here again when Rodgers was on the way out and made numerous threads about that too. Always has niggling little digs at our posters too.
I don't have a problem with you creating additional threads. What I object to is you doing it but slagging me off when I do it. Plenty of people create duplicate threads. Just look at all the next manager threads? Yet I'm the only one you single out, even though many of my threads are the first ones on a topic. Get over it.
Casual,
It's all well and good "skipping" threads, but if there's 5 or 6 on the same subject, on the first page, then it puts posters off browsing the next page/bottom of that page. I know this, because I'm the same.
I have now deleted the ones with least replies as I did'nt realise that another three were posted in the last 24 hours prior to my last post.
It's all well and good "skipping" threads, but if there's 5 or 6 on the same subject, on the first page, then it puts posters off browsing the next page/bottom of that page. I know this, because I'm the same.
I have now deleted the ones with least replies as I did'nt realise that another three were posted in the last 24 hours prior to my last post.
The posts that stay should obviously be the ones that most people view and comment on. If threads are unpopular they soon disappear. That's the general way a forum works and it works quite well.
Fair point. But more will get posted. You will get multiple posts once it's official. So at what point are you going to delete them. But I bet you won't. Same as with the next manage posts. Lost of them but a new one even got made a sticky. what's that all about.
The one that was made a sticky, was made to become a game. The creator of the thread, a well respected poster and Swansea fan asked me to sticky it as to focus fans minds on one thread and create a little fun.
Casual,I don't want to appear to be taking sides here,but you do have a penchant for creating threads when similar/identical ones already exist.
For the life of me I cannot understand why you felt the need to create a new one this a.m.,which I see has now been removed by JA.
Six or seven threads on the same subject just make this Forum a nonsense.
For the life of me I cannot understand why you felt the need to create a new one this a.m.,which I see has now been removed by JA.
Six or seven threads on the same subject just make this Forum a nonsense.
When you were creating thread after thread on exactly the same subject you were criticised, not just by me but others including one of the moderators ! And where since then have I slagged you off casual fan, post links to that if you will, because you won't find any !
So either grow the hell up, or follow your own advice and ignore the threads you don't like, it's pretty easy you know as they will drop off the forum.