When the camera cut to him standing next to the fourth official with the board he got a bigger groan at the pub than the Nasri goal.
....same thing in my front room...and I was the only one there! When the camera cut to him standing next to the fourth official with the board he got a bigger groan at the pub than the Nasri goal.
....same thing in my front room...and I was the only one there! Kjaer's up for grabs, as he's stated that he won't play for Magath again, but he'll probably make his move to Roma permanent.
They're changing manager this summer though, so it might not happen.
Now that we've had the first round of games, which players would we - realistically - like to see at Spurs next season?
I have to agree with YV, mainly.
Gerrard did a fairly decent job of protecting the back four, except for the goal, but he offered very little offensively.
Even with the same team selection, I'd have preferred Milner in the middle, Young out on the left and Gerrard in behind Welbeck.
I disagree about Chamberlain, though.
He was targeted by some very cynical tactics, which the ref simply didn't deal with.
Every time he tried to break at pace, someone would just take him out and somehow escape a caution.
You'd expect an Italian official to be more aware of that kind of thing.
What I've just seen by YV and PNP about SG is about right. Although we've done ok to get the draw with France, we need to start beating teams now and its the creative side that was sorely missing which concerns me now, where will the goals come from? The trend for the tournament so far is set pieces and as a Spurs fan I don't feel I'm in a position to comment about them!![]()
Too true, England do look fairly dangerous though at set pieces. Should have had loads more free kicks too. Any chance England are suffering from Young's growing rep as a diver?Now that we've had the first round of games, which players would we - realistically - like to see at Spurs next season?

Another Mistake from Cech,two in two Games,as bad as the goon's keeper
France look like less than the sum of their parts. I can see why they have trouble scoring. They had all the possession, and played all the attractive football, but didn't create a single good chance from open play. The only one for either team was the open goal Milner missed.
England look like they'll need a win from their next game, and that's the trouble. Trying to get a win while parking the bus is iffy at best. Trying to play more positively, well, I just don't see the players with the ability to do it. Granted that France get high marks for closing down, but the fact was England could hardly hold onto the ball for more than a couple of seconds whether they dribbled or passed.
While I disagreed strongly with much of his selection, given who he picked I would have played almost the same team as Roy (I would have put Jagielka in for Terry), right down to Young out of position at CM and Gerrard out of position at DM. I think Young didn't work out. Chances are good Roy will shift Gerrard to CM and put Young back on the left--which means we may have a choice between two Liverpool disasters, Henderson or Carrol, depending on how ambitious Roy is feeling. Yikes.
Still, few things have been more predictable than England in major tournaments, so if that trend continues they'll finish second, somehow. How's about a 1-0 win over Sweden and a 2-2 draw against Ukraine, edging France for second on goals?
I think a lot of people would have taken the draw before the French game. Now suddenly it isn't good enough! I think it was a good result and we played pretty well. Play less "negative" (and we were hardly being Chelski) and we risked losing. You can't lose your first game at these tournaments. This performance was already miles better than anything in South Africa and still there's complaints.