He missed a few chances but he gave no M'boro player on the ball any time. Guly is a totally different player so I don't know how you can compare the two.
People backing Hammond, the play is so off the pace it's unbelievable. He sometimes get's by passed like he's not even there.
I wasn't really comparing the two. I was using your statement as an indication of fans' views and how I see Saints fans. You said he was Superb, and I wanted to point out that I felt he wasn't; he just worked hard. Yes they are different types of players, but that is my point: people won't say Guly plays "superb" because he doesn't appear to give the all action effort of Chappers. And, they have been playing in the same position, so my statemnet of Guly on form over chappers on form, still stands.
If it isn't clear, I mean. Who plays RM? A good chappers or a good Guly?