Bahrain in doubt yet again

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It took a while but F1 media are now reporting the DDoS attack. Now, how quickly can Formula1.com react?

You must log in or register to see images


Well done, Formula 1. Nice job.

Sorry if that sounds disingenuously condemnatory but I'm referring to Ecclestone's repeated invitations to protestors to use F1 to get their point across, including during Crown Prince's interview following FP2 today when he said Crown Prince was "silly" for having F1 there and giving the protestors a global media audience.

The release of today's press conference seems tardy but Sky has just shown a snippet of it.
 
I don't think it is. Have you tried browsing around, looking at results, etc.? DDoS doesn't actually take a site down, it just makes access sporadic and lethargic because it's being bombarded by thousands of requests.

Yeah it running fine for about a minute, completely gone again now.
 
Ummm haven't we just been to China? You don't see protests there because they'd be stamped out before they start. Won't we be going to Abu Dhabi later this season which has a very similar form of government? It won't be long before we're off to Russia where there are currently protests against corrupt elections.

These aren't easy decisions - clearly the safety of teams, circuit staff, spectators and local citizens should be paramount but if you cancel unnecessarily then where will violence be utilised to gain publicity next?

If you start boycotting countries on moral grounds, where does it stop? Anyway, does boycotting achieve as much as engaging with suspect regimes?

Rubbish circuit though I agree.
 
If you start boycotting countries on moral grounds, where does it stop? Anyway, does boycotting achieve as much as engaging with suspect regimes?

Good points. On this forum, the focus of the argument against running the race has been in relation to F1 being used by the Bahraini authorities for political ends, rather than because of the government's uncompromising response to protests or its authoritarian rule but observations of events and political positions are inevitable.

I agree that it's not F1's place to pass judgement on whether a country it goes to is being run according to whatever social and political mores another country espouses and just about every country it visits can be accused of oppression and corruption, either current or historic.

I do think that Ecclestone has courted political involvement while claiming that he isn't.
 
Ummm haven't we just been to China? You don't see protests there because they'd be stamped out before they start. Won't we be going to Abu Dhabi later this season which has a very similar form of government? It won't be long before we're off to Russia where there are currently protests against corrupt elections.

These aren't easy decisions - clearly the safety of teams, circuit staff, spectators and local citizens should be paramount but if you cancel unnecessarily then where will violence be utilised to gain publicity next?

If you start boycotting countries on moral grounds, where does it stop? Anyway, does boycotting achieve as much as engaging with suspect regimes?

Rubbish circuit though I agree.

Your points about China and Abu Dhabi are correct, no doubt, but in Bahrain Formula One's presence is so intertwined with the escalation of both protest and its suppression, unlike in those two countries. The race is still on because of money, not sport and I think you will know that. There are also grave safety concerns, which were not the case last week in China either.