Off Topic Bill Nicholson Arms

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Dona - I'm not really discounting Bilic with what i said, just listing a few cons, if Harry goes there'll be a short list to discuss, and there'll be pro's n con's for each candidate.
 
notsosmartspur said:
Dona - I'm not really discounting Bilic with what i said, just listing a few cons, if Harry goes there'll be a short list to discuss, and there'll be pro's n con's for each candidate.
Click to expand...

yeh totally agree Notso......its good to debate and open up a few more possibilities or close some trapdoors....i just struggle to see who we could get in really that would suit all our agendas....ida snapped both of Ancelotti's arms off to have him.
 
It's been posted before Dona, but I think the club take it down.
Enjoy it while it lasts. <ok>
 
Great stuff PNP they should play this in the dressing before the match. <ok>

In fact it should be played in the tunnel when the teams are waiting to come out.
 
littleDinosaurLuke said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17769654

Spurs 11th ahead of City.

Utd= 2 Liverpools, a Spurs and a City :huh:
Click to expand...

just goes to show that we are underachieving if we are in and amongst that list when it comes to finances because we have a small ground and a wage ceiling....so that is a money saver compared to all them too....makes me wonder...however the numebrs look dodgy considering the immediate successes of some of the teams.....i mean lets be honest City are 12th? thats meaningless..so therefore is the rest of the list.
 
Dona_mara said:
just goes to show that we are underachieving if we are in and amongst that list when it comes to finances because we have a small ground and a wage ceiling....so that is a money saver compared to all them too....makes me wonder...however the numebrs look dodgy considering the immediate successes of some of the teams.....i mean lets be honest City are 12th? thats meaningless..so therefore is the rest of the list.
Click to expand...

We're the 5th English team, closely followed by City who have loads of money. I'd say we're slightly overachieving in the League if you use that table.
 
Yid Vicious said:
We're the 5th English team, closely followed by City who have loads of money. I'd say we're slightly overachieving in the League if you use that table.
Click to expand...

i get your point considering we cant be in europe competing with the other teams in that table if we are in 5th in our league.
...but i wouldnt say we are over achieveing..to me it seems typically spurs..on the cresp of something great but struggling to get there.
 
Dona_mara said:
i get your point considering we cant be in europe competing with the other teams in that table if we are in 5th in our league.
...but i wouldnt say we are over achieveing..to me it seems typically spurs..on the cresp of something great but struggling to get there.
Click to expand...

If you click to the thread I posted above, Forbes were implying in last years' list that we were a solid investment, and the fact our value is steadily increasing implies this - with a new stadium to come, which will inflate our value with our coffers.
 
Lisbon - Bilbao on C5 now incase anyone's interested. Should be a good game and a chance to watch Van Wolfs****** :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back