Worst analogy ever
If you have a 15 point lead, it's 15 points regardless of whether you've played one, two or 35 extra games. It really is that simple.
I'm shocked at the lack of understanding!
The Scottish Cup
- Thread starter rogueleader
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I'm shocked at the lack of understanding!
This wasn't being done instead of paying creditors. It was being done to ensure the maximum return within the pot. Looking at the bigger picture isn't your strong point is it?
And pray tell how signing a 35 year old has been on a short-term contract for between 5 and 7.5k per week was "maximising the return within the pot"?
Worst analogy ever
If you have a 15 point lead, it's 15 points regardless of whether you've played one, two or 35 extra games. It really is that simple.
So how can we "chuck" this lead if celtc had games in hand? That's impossible.
In sporting terms a lead is a lead when you've earned it. Not when you've played more games than your rivals. Chickens should never be counted, especially with trebles
Team A has 50 points
Team B has 35 points
Team A is leading Team B by 15 points
You hear this all the time in sport. In the Tour De France for example you hear them talk of Rider A having a 38 second lead over the field.
It's not complicated.
Team B has 35 points
Team A is leading Team B by 15 points
You hear this all the time in sport. In the Tour De France for example you hear them talk of Rider A having a 38 second lead over the field.
It's not complicated.
The primary duty of care is to the creditors. Given that administration hit Rangers with a ten point penalty sending them a whopping 14 points behind Celtic. So what prize money is it you think cousin could have helped with? Standard protocol is to cut costs. Not add to them. Stop talking ****e.
even if Cousin could have helped in a long shot gamble to try and overturn such a lead, wages, agents fees and other costs would have made somewhere in the region of £200k. More than worth it
.....sure thing 
We had no strikers, he is a striker and a pretty handy one in the SPL at that. Since the deal had already been done it had to be followed through. Another important factor is that Cousin could have sued Rangers if we'd just turned round and said, "Actually Dan, we're in admin now so that contract you just signed is worthless, see you later."
It had to be followed through otherwise we could have ended up paying the wages for nothing. You would have loved that though.
So you accept that Rangers have never earned a single win in the last 10 years? In sporting terms of course.
Where do you start with this one, you do understand they're on 75% pay cuts? Many of them offered to play for free, however that is not allowed.
Fatty?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16967931 - From 11th February 2012
We went into administration on 14th Feb 2012.
You need to go back to school son
By the way Frank, see that link you provided to prove that Cousin had signed before 14th February?
Explain why McCoist said in this same link:
You went into administration on Tuesday 14th Feb.
So everything you've said about Cousin in this thread is utter, utter bullshit
What could he sue Rangers for? Not being able to register him? A signing is complete when the documents are lodged with the relevant authority.
Team A has 50 points
Team B has 35 points
Team A is leading Team B by 15 points
You hear this all the time in sport. In the Tour De France for example you hear them talk of Rider A having a 38 second lead over the field.
It's not complicated.
Fuck me gently. They use seconds in the Tour de France because riders generally don't have measuring tape lodged between them.
The primary duty of care is to the creditors. Given that administration hit Rangers with a ten point penalty sending them a whopping 14 points behind Celtic. So what prize money is it you think cousin could have helped with? Standard protocol is to cut costs. Not add to them. Stop talking ****e.
even if Cousin could have helped in a long shot gamble to try and overturn such a lead, wages, agents fees and other costs would have made somewhere in the region of £200k. More than worth it
Are you aware of the difference between finishing 2nd and 3rd? It's quite significant.
So how can we "chuck" this lead if celtc had games in hand? That's impossible.
In sporting terms a lead is a lead when you've earned it. Not when you've played more games than your rivals. Chickens should never be counted, especially with trebles
Someone might want to tell Mr Jelavic about that
I can confirm that all Rangers victories and all celtc defeats are "pure no fair" in sporting terms according to auld seizure Billy McNeill. This mentality was on display in its finest this afternoon.
Eh, loss of earnings. Rangers, due to the actions of Craig Whyte were culpable by ending up in administration. Not following through with the registration would have left us gaping wider open than your arsehole.
Someone might want to tell Mr Jelavic about that
and Mr Caldwell, Mr Fortune, Mrs Samaras, Mr Keane, Mr Mowbray, Mr Grant, Mr Hartson etc etc......
But when there is a TABLE charting their progress it is irrelevant?Yes. Are you arguing that Duff and Phelps should have sanctioned a signing at £5-£7.5k a week to ensure Rangers held on to second spot. At a time when running costs needed to be slashed by £4m?