No one is Invincible

[Drogs]

Robby . I'll check his IP and get right on it, now it's been said he does have that distinct stench about his writing style...

There are punctuation and grammar errors ffs

Maybe it's to throw people off

 

[No Kane No Gain]

Maybe it's to throw people off

I don't think it reflects well on you that you think so deviously

 

[Sidney Fiddler]

Drogs

Is that Sidney kiddy Fiddler Ensil? if so **** him off the board mate, don't need ****s like that souring the barrel.

I am sorry if you dont like another opinion to your own.
I wish you all the best but being honest l cant see you
winning.
The football world will be behind Barc because of their
beauty, style and ethos.
Chin up
Sid

 

[Drogs]

Maybe it's to throw people off

I don't think it reflects well on you that you think so deviously

Not my fault I have to be on edge because one ****flap has 68 different accounts

 

[Chelsea Pensioner]

A small club in comparison, competing against the greatest team ever. The quality difference is so wide that it would take a miracle like
the parting of the Red sea for a Chelsea victory over two legs.
Maybe Roman could buy this one? as its your only chance.
Just being honest, good luck.

Can agree with you about Barcelonas' standing, but PLEEEEESEE stop the "small club " horse ****. If we are a small club , what does that make United, City, Arsenal, Spurs , Ajax, PSG, Porto, Roma, Milan ( both ) Juventus, Panathanikos... shall I go on ?????
Don't see any of them in the QF for 6 years in a row.
Only very small minds think we are a small club. And small minds mean small intellect, as evidenced by your post. Roman has so far failed to buy any CL win, but we are light year ahead of all and any other PL team in the recent CL history. Suck it up, you ring piece.

 

[SpursDisciple]

Can agree with you about Barcelonas' standing, but PLEEEEESEE stop the "small club " horse ****. If we are a small club , what does that make United, City, Arsenal, Spurs , Ajax, PSG, Porto, Roma, Milan ( both ) Juventus, Panathanikos... shall I go on ?????
Don't see any of them in the QF for 6 years in a row.
Only very small minds think we are a small club. And small minds mean small intellect, as evidenced by your post. Roman has so far failed to buy any CL win, but we are light year ahead of all and any other PL team in the recent CL history. Suck it up, you ring piece.

To be fair, everyone is a small club next to Barca (and that seems to be the point made).

 

[AndyI]

Can agree with you about Barcelonas' standing, but PLEEEEESEE stop the "small club " horse ****. If we are a small club , what does that make United, City, Arsenal, Spurs , Ajax, PSG, Porto, Roma, Milan ( both ) Juventus, Panathanikos... shall I go on ?????
Don't see any of them in the QF for 6 years in a row.
Only very small minds think we are a small club. And small minds mean small intellect, as evidenced by your post. Roman has so far failed to buy any CL win, but we are light year ahead of all and any other PL team in the recent CL history. Suck it up, you ring piece.

3 finals in 4 seasons, to go with 3 titles and 5 finals in total. I'd say its makes them a bigger club than Chelsea! Same with Ajax, Inter, AC , Juve etc.

Making the Qf's is great but in the big scheme of things, matters not, as far as history is concerned.
It's just the same as stupid Arsenal fans taking the piss out of Liverpool because they play in the CL every year. But they still can't win it!!
Lots of teams play in the CL every year like Moscow or Panathnikos etc.

This is what matters:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_Cup_and_UEFA_Champions_League_winners

However your right that Chelsea arn't a small club but they are not a European heavyweight either. Ther'e all at the top of that list.

 

[District Line]

Why do you think this is important? They will start as overwhelming favourites, regardless of recent history. Fact is they beat you last time you met (11 players or not) and while they were desperately lucky, it won't make them nervous about playing you.

We#re not saying that, we accept our chances are minimal, but when I hear things like "Chelsea have NO chance" and "Barca will thrash Chelsea" it's ridiculous. We are in the semi's for a reason and the fact that we have played Barca on numerous ocassions and held our own suggests to me we won't get thrashed.

When we played Barca in 1999 when they had the likes of Rivaldo, Figo, Kluivert, Gabri, Xavi etc and the gulf between the sides was far larger then but we took them all the way.

 

[Drogs]

Why do you think this is important? They will start as overwhelming favourites, regardless of recent history. Fact is they beat you last time you met (11 players or not) and while they were desperately lucky, it won't make them nervous about playing you.

We#re not saying that, we accept our chances are minimal, but when I hear things like "Chelsea have NO chance" and "Barca will thrash Chelsea" it's ridiculous. We are in the semi's for a reason and the fact that we have played Barca on numerous ocassions and held our own suggests to me we won't get thrashed.

When we played Barca in 1999 when they had the likes of Rivaldo, Figo, Kluivert, Gabri, Xavi etc and the gulf between the sides was far larger then but we took them all the way.

What a game that was . I remember Zola's free kick like it was yesterday

 

[CFCTEL]

To beat Barcalona we need Miereles, Mikel and Ramires in the midfield. To kill Barca you need to kill the Xavi - Iniesta to be stifield by the constant energy of two box to boxes, and a holding to pick up the pieces. Man marking Messi is not an option, you have to kill the ball before it gets to him. Sadly, we have the right types of player, not the quality required I think.

Meireles couldn't stifle a cough with a handkerchief mate!