No, i just wanted Ghadaffi out, the man was a terrorist. I couldn't have gave a **** who replaced him, mr blobby could do it.
Well if I was of that opinion I would be a bit of a ****, which is why I made the comparison to your behaviour.
But how can he be a terrorist if he is the internationally recognised leader of the nation. Surely the armed uprising (including many foreign Al qaeda fighters) are the terrorists? You are very confused boy. Do you support the current uprising (including many foreign Al qaeda fighters) against Assad
No i don't, i think the country as a whole should just be nuked. If i had my way, there wouldn't be a middle east. I would have bombed them all years ago.
"The semitic tribes converted to Islam and the current Palestians are the direct genetic descendants of the Semitic tribes" Bullshit The Jews at the time of Mohammed refused to convert to islam (after centuries of persecution from polytheists/Christians) and that helped turn Mohammed into the *****phile anti-Semitic warmongerer he died as
there we have it, you are as informed and educated as those evangelical redneck bumpkins. I refuse to allow myself to get drawn down to that level of idiocy, good night sir, im away for a **** and a snooze
You see now I genuinely remember why there was a marker in my brain to ignore whatever it was that Kyle bloke says, because you are indeed a shoot-from-the-hip idiot.
How is it idiocy, and why should we even care, how does a Syrian uprising affect Britain? If the news did it's job properly, it would only focus on stories that actually affect us, rather than some bullshit from the other side of the globe.
oh dear, how embarrassing for you. an admittance of you purposfully avoiding debates you know you wont win if ever I saw it
Maybe i am, but thats just the way i operate. I make a judgement on something in a second, and i'm normally right. That's why i will be one hell of a barrister when i graduate.
aaaaaand thats an excuse to nuke an entire nation how? surely you could just stop reading the stories as since that, in your own insular little world, Britain is all that matters to you you would want to avoid the harmful effect on Britain from the fallout from the amount of nuclear weapons it would require to nuke Syria
The belief in absolutes is a very studenty thing. You'll understand what I mean when you mature and realise there is not a big black and white line between good and evil, right and wrong - just points of views and experiences.
I would say maybe 6-7 tridents would get the job done, it's not that big a country. There wouldn't be a fallout, Syria offers nothing to britain. We aren't trade partners, and it pisses off the chinese, always a good thing.
Law teaches you that there are lot's of grey areas where morality and ethics are concerned, however, i think it's bullshit. It's plainly obvious, just by looking at someone, if they're guilty or not.
Okay, we'll send you over there, see what you can do. take out your anti-government rage on the syrian people.
lets not even get into the fact that the russians and chinese would come down on you like a ton of ****. A few tridents would destroy a few population centres, the russians/chinese have a big enough armoury to return Britain to the North Sea and still hav enough to deter the US getting involved. this is ludicrous, I cant believe I am actually entertaining this sort of arguement
Actually the belief in moral absolutes is strongest amongst older people Younger people have a more relaxed attitude in that respect, while they tend to vote for the political absolute of the Left
