They seem to go from one extreme to another on that board. First they were talking about Europe when it didn't look likely and now they're saying they will go down even though they have a good chance of survival. There are also an awful lot of * when you read through. They really do like to swear and abuse people for the smallest thing!
damn goal line technology , sterilise the game and make it boring, god there would be so many calls damn games would not finish until after 6pm. and if it is al so clinical why would I ever have cause to abuse the lino ever again?
I think you have to have some sympathy for QPR, we have to acknowledge that it wasn't a corner in the first place, but yes once the corner is given, then you just have to play on, but the linesman didn't see it ha ha ha ha ha.
If technology was used to say whether a goal should have been given because the ball crossed the line, then wouldn't Bolton be justified in calling for technology to decide if Cisse was offside? I don't know where it would end.
If the Clint Hill Goal had stood then who knows what would have happened. Just all those fans wishing for another club to be relegated remember what happened to the likes of Hull City and Reading are they still in the Premier league, 2nd season syndrome can come back to any newly promoted team.
True, second season syndrome can happen to anyone, probably Hull were guilty of the same thing in thier 2nd as QPR in first season; too many players on too high wages. I don't really wish bad things on QPR, but the way you've tried to stave off relegation by buying expensive players on big wages symbolises everything that is wrong with football, and things like you going down and Rangers going into admin, may just start to bring people to their senses
Its a good job that QPR fans are a reasonable bunch who will understand that Cisse was offside for their goal and that the Clint Hill "goal" came from a corner that wasnt a corner anyway, and won't bang on about this for the rest of the season. oh....
As far as I'm concerned, the philosopher known as Barton was cheating anyway. The ball was not in the quadrant initially, even the commentator said "what benefit is he expecting to gain by putting the ball an inch over the line", the ref came over and told him to put it back, and what did the serial complainer do then? Placed it about a foot outside the line, then moved it back to it's original position, still outside the line! If we're going to have technology in the game then cheating should be targeted, Barton would be permanantly suspended QPR would be relegated and the rest of the world would be happy. a) It wasn't a corner in the first place. b) Barton was cheating and should have been booked. c) Justice was done. d) Mark Hughes is a moaning twat. That is all. ILD OTBC
