Chavs in Q finals

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
-jordan- said:
i'll enjoy seein terry weep like a bitch again
Click to expand...

you mean like nani the other week against Liverpool? What a jessie.

Anyway, not a draw either of us would want i guess but at least the semi for who makes it (with the 2nd game at home) looks a lot more inviting. Certainly we are both better off than spurs!!

A real 50/50 draw though I fancy us to edge it just because it is all we really have left. Every weekend is like a cup final for you guys at the moment and it is telling with injuries etc.
 
chelsea - over 100 years of history said:
you mean like nani the other week against Liverpool? What a jessie.

Anyway, not a draw either of us would want i guess but at least the semi for who makes it (with the 2nd game at home) looks a lot more inviting. Certainly we are both better off than spurs!!

A real 50/50 draw though I fancy us to edge it just because it is all we really have left. Every weekend is like a cup final for you guys at the moment and it is telling with injuries etc.
Click to expand...

Had the second leg been at SB, then I would go for Chelsea, but its at OT, so I fancy Man Utd. Its similar to Chelsea Liverpool, had Chelsea been at home second then they would have qualified(like they did once) but when away second its harder.
 
I Sit Next To A Badger-Leazes Corner said:
Had the second leg been at SB, then I would go for Chelsea, but its at OT, so I fancy Man Utd. Its similar to Chelsea Liverpool, had Chelsea been at home second then they would have qualified(like they did once) but when away second its harder.
Click to expand...

We actually knocked out liverpool twice (both times second leg at home) but i see your point. However, our record at old trafford is pretty good so im not particularly worried about that. Could toss a coin on it.

It can be harder but it comes down to the away goals. When we knocked out arsenal in 04 we were level just after half time in the second leg with an away goal a piece. Arsenal shat themselves cos they knew another away goal would kill them off and they went to pieces. If we got say a 1-0 at the bridge, that would be very hard for you to turn around cos at OT, we get 1, you need 3 etc.
 
chelsea - over 100 years of history said:
We actually knocked out liverpool twice (both times second leg at home) but i see your point. However, our record at old trafford is pretty good so im not particularly worried about that. Could toss a coin on it.
Click to expand...

That's what he means - whenever Chelsea and Liverpool has met in the CL, the team playing the second leg at home has won (IIRC). It can be a pretty big advantage in Europe - one of the reasons Garcia's "ghost goal" in 2005 was given was the reaction from the Anfield crowd - had he done the same at SB it might not have been given.

Either way, it's not a bad draw for either of us. We can both avoid the Spanish sides until the final, and I think whoever gets through will be reasonably confident of beating Inter / Schalke, neither of which have been hugely impressive this season.
 
We have won our last 3 Prem matches against Utd so why should we fear them,they are a good side but I bet the Utd fans are more worried about it than us.
 
Won your last 3 games but I dont think anybody thinks you deserved to win any. You played well second half of the most recent game but other than that its been pretty even and decided by shocking refs.

Probably the toughest tie for both clubs this mind. I think we will win but chelsea will win at home.
 
UnitedinRed said:
Won your last 3 games but I dont think anybody thinks you deserved to win any. You played well second half of the most recent game but other than that its been pretty even and decided by shocking refs.

Probably the toughest tie for both clubs this mind. I think we will win but chelsea will win at home.
Click to expand...

They deserved to win at OT last season. We really froze that day and didn't get going till the second half. Even then it was all huff-and-puff rather than quality. We should have won at the Bridge though last season. We played well that day. As for our last encounter, a draw would've been a fair result, it was a perfect example of a game of 2 halves. With all that in mind, I think we're due a bit of luck against them. If I remember correctly, they've not beaten us without the aid of a contentious decision since May 2006, when Rooney broke his foot and they hammered us 3-0.
 
I think a draw would of been fair at OT last season, I think although we weren't very good chelsea were nothing special and last season at the bridge we really should of taken all the points as you say.

this season a draw would of been fair.......but we should of had it under control at half time and given chelsea little to no chance of getting back into it.

Over 2 legs and with last years disappointment and the fact that the chelsea strikers are dire this season we should win.
 
Jip Jaap Stam said:
They deserved to win at OT last season. We really froze that day and didn't get going till the second half. Even then it was all huff-and-puff rather than quality. We should have won at the Bridge though last season. We played well that day. As for our last encounter, a draw would've been a fair result, it was a perfect example of a game of 2 halves. With all that in mind, I think we're due a bit of luck against them. If I remember correctly, they've not beaten us without the aid of a contentious decision since May 2006, when Rooney broke his foot and they hammered us 3-0.
Click to expand...

yeah thats right, its always the ref that causes united to lose!! jesus wept.

they are tight games and these will be no different. If one decision can be the difference then that merely illustrates this further.
 
UnitedinRed said:
I think a draw would of been fair at OT last season, I think although we weren't very good chelsea were nothing special and last season at the bridge we really should of taken all the points as you say.

this season a draw would of been fair.......but we should of had it under control at half time and given chelsea little to no chance of getting back into it.

Over 2 legs and with last years disappointment and the fact that the chelsea strikers are dire this season we should win.
Click to expand...


I believe anelka has more champs leagues goals than any of your mob this season. And i think we've had a damn sight more disappointments than you lot in this comp!!
 
Swarbs said:
That's what he means - whenever Chelsea and Liverpool has met in the CL, the team playing the second leg at home has won (IIRC). It can be a pretty big advantage in Europe - one of the reasons Garcia's "ghost goal" in 2005 was given was the reaction from the Anfield crowd - had he done the same at SB it might not have been given.

Non goal lol, like Chelsea's non goal last season becase of offside, you moaned lotsa about this I am fairly certain, blaming it on you not winning the title.
BTW fans don't award goals, doh.

Inter just went through on the away tie as they scored 3 goals away, hows that for your ideas of secod leg away, if Chelsea destroy united 4 0 at th bridge (Not likely) then the second tie would mean very little.

it is 50 50 work, job to to in each game home or away no matter in what order, knowing what you have to do in a second tie doesn't mean you can get it done. Chelsea won 3 1 at Anfield and 4 4 at home, they done their work away and went through even though they conceded 4 away goals. Job done first leg away.

If you are good enough you will win, all this nonsense of an advantage with the second tie at home is thought so because you know what you have to do and have a home tie to do it. If you dont do the other half away then it aint worth much, Didn't inter knock out Barca with the second leg at the Nou last year?

Chelsea need ot take a clean sheet and a goal to OT to give them the best chance and play it tight at OT and try get an away goal, isn't that how it usually goes in these ties
Click to expand...
 
BringBackfootie said:
Swarbs said:
That's what he means - whenever Chelsea and Liverpool has met in the CL, the team playing the second leg at home has won (IIRC). It can be a pretty big advantage in Europe - one of the reasons Garcia's "ghost goal" in 2005 was given was the reaction from the Anfield crowd - had he done the same at SB it might not have been given.

Non goal lol, like Chelsea's non goal last season becase of offside, you moaned lotsa about this I am fairly certain, blaming it on you not winning the title.
BTW fans don't award goals, doh.

Inter just went through on the away tie as they scored 3 goals away, hows that for your ideas of secod leg away, if Chelsea destroy united 4 0 at th bridge (Not likely) then the second tie would mean very little.

it is 50 50 work, job to to in each game home or away no matter in what order, knowing what you have to do in a second tie doesn't mean you can get it done. Chelsea won 3 1 at Anfield and 4 4 at home, they done their work away and went through even though they conceded 4 away goals. Job done first leg away.

If you are good enough you will win, all this nonsense of an advantage with the second tie at home is thought so because you know what you have to do and have a home tie to do it. If you dont do the other half away then it aint worth much, Didn't inter knock out Barca with the second leg at the Nou last year?

Chelsea need ot take a clean sheet and a goal to OT to give them the best chance and play it tight at OT and try get an away goal, isn't that how it usually goes in these ties
Click to expand...

a 0-0 can be a good result also as Marseille nearly proved.
Click to expand...
 
chelsea - over 100 years of history said:
yeah thats right, its always the ref that causes united to lose!! jesus wept.
Click to expand...

Read the post again. I didn't say United only lost because of the ref. I just said Chelsea have had a bit of help along the way, which they have. There have been dodgy decisions in the last 3 games (Luiz's non-sending off, Terry's handball... Drogba's ridiculously offside goal... Rooney's incorrectly disallowed goal, Valencia should've had a pen, Fletcher didn't foul anybody for freekick which led to an offside Drogba dragging Wes Brown away from scorer John Terry), and your only other win in the last half-decade was in April 2008, when Carrick had the ball blasted at him from 6 yards, and despite keeping his hands down, somehow conceded a penalty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back