We play a 4-3-3 with RVP as a spearhead lone striker, so it's natural that he will score most of our goals. That is after all the role of a striker. If he wasn't playing, I would suggest that whoever took his place would be likely to score from of the numerous chances that the rest of the team create for him
If they are I challenge you to prove it, if you are unable to then I would suggest that it might be prudent to cease confirming your stupidity.
Believing something and thinking something are not one and the same thing. That SamuraisShadow thinks what he does of you is a fact and I have seen nothing to suggest that you are not as he thinks of you so.
You think I'm Wenger too? .....just about sums about how seriously your opinion should be taken really.
Thus demonstrating that your personality and attitude are one and the same. I know you have personal problems Simon, so I also understand that your opinion of me is based from within those.
Laughable again - I have no personal problems, my opinion of you is based upon what you write on these boards, the fact that you are duplicitous & two faced, your approach to others and the way you moderate (sic) your own board.
....do you really believe that! Chelsea play 433 with a spearhead of Torres!!, so 'naturally' the rest of the team has had to score enough goals to sit above you in the league! Do you suggest Chamakh might take his place and score from these numerous chances? ...oh, hang on, haven't you already tried that?
Thank you, see my signature picture. Some people lay down and get trampled on - I like to stand up to idiots and defend my corner, sometimes that means getting in first. After all it's not as though I don't speak my mind or the truth, like me or loath me I am very much a case of what you see is what you get. PS - Why the name change?
I am merely sharing someone else's opinion of him, that that person is a supporter of the same team is just a coincidence ;-)
hope not..itll get closed..and it doesnt deserve to be as all the Spurs fans use it to talk all things relating to our 'rivals' for CL qualification..PL etc etc
It was never intended to be however 1 or 2 of the followers of the minor club that think themselves a rival tried to start an argument. I haven't seen them for a while though, perhaps me using facts to counter their speculative argument proved too much for them.
Right well I'll try and turn things back to 'on-topic': It's Chelsea vs Man Utd today and I think I speak for most Spurs fans when I say 'I hope it's a draw' - I'd like to keep Chelsea a good distance away for as long as possible but if we keep our form up, I don't want United to be too far away!
I would like to see a United win - Mancheater Pity don't deserve to win the league, United do. I would also like to see as much damage done as possible to Fulham's junior club - another club whose owners think that money is the answer to everything. The cracks are beginning to appear at Stamford Bridge and I, for one, can't wait to see the collapse.
Your point about wanting to United to win the league is one I agree with - I didn't really care who won it (out of the 2 Manchester clubs) until recently but Mancini's constant 'the world is against me' and his card-waving antics along with what happened in the City-Spurs game have really turned me off them. I'd still prefer a draw though followed by a Utd win - I don't want Chelsea getting momentum really.