Who is more credible?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who is more credible?

  • Jip Jaap Stam

  • thefanwithnoname

Results are only viewable after voting.
It was on the global warming thread where Jip would come top in a poll about which one was more credible so I decided to post it. I suppose we are looking at general credibility.
 
Sam Axe said:
It was on the global warming thread where Jip would come top in a poll about which one was more credible so I decided to post it. I suppose we are looking at general credibility.
Click to expand...

tbf this was jips response to being proven wrong

that in itself takes away any credibility he had/has ?
 
In fairness iv never seen someone with the perseverence of fan. The idiocy of some of the stuff on the Iran/Israel thread nearly had me smashing my head against a wall. Fan merely calmly went on to debunk whatever ****e they could fling and keep rebuffing repeated stereotypes.
 
The Hatem-Bomb said:
In fairness iv never seen someone with the perseverence of fan. The idiocy of some of the stuff on the Iran/Israel thread nearly had me smashing my head against a wall. Fan merely calmly went on to debunk whatever ****e they could fling and keep rebuffing repeated stereotypes.
Click to expand...

Ths is the thing that I cannot understand when it comes to me or my viewpoints

I get accused of avoiding, yet try to answer every question
Some accuse me of not answering then accuse me of writing 5 posts in a go - usually all addressed to different folk
I dont tend to resort to insults unless specifically provoked, yet get accussed of resorting to insults

I acknowledge if people dont share a viewpoint but give a reason for why I do
I get accused of using particular sources, yet am given wikki links to read as evidence

Maybe you can explain it to me, as I value your opinion
 
thefanwithnoname said:
Ths is the thing that I cannot understand when it comes to me or my viewpoints

I get accused of avoiding, yet try to answer every question
Some accuse me of not answering then accuse me of writing 5 posts in a go - usually all addressed to different folk
I dont tend to resort to insults unless specifically provoked, yet get accussed of resorting to insults

I acknowledge if people dont share a viewpoint but give a reason for why I do
I get accused of using particular sources, yet am given wikki links to read as evidence

Maybe you can explain it to me, as I value your opinion
Click to expand...

Its all just tactics to avoid an admission of fault. People arent going to be involved in a 500 post debate and suddenly admit to you when it may have clicked on them they were wrong ( even though the realisation may still have hit them), they just arent going to let someone have that victory when they have posted so much of their time, effort and future forum credibility into the debate. ( people like ST spring immediately to mind here)

So in the absence of their ability to counter points of debate you will get deflections, posts being ignored in the hope they wont be called on them, accusations being flung, all to keep up the appearance of being right in the hope that you will fatigue of the effort to keep countering them
 
Jip Jaap Stam said:
Proved me wrong on what count? The fact you don't understand the significance of the word 'might' doesn't make me wrong Fan.
Click to expand...

thems just semantics and you know it

fact is I did a thread about global warming and you referred back to threads on creationism then tried to make out I bought it up

and i repeat saying something is possible IS acknowledgement

especially if initially your stance was it doesnt exist

As far as I am concerned if the starting point is someone saying god exists and a person argues he doesnt, and by the end of it the other person says it is possible and might have existed, its a victory
 
thefanwithnoname said:
FFS sam

since you outed yourself by admitting to your gay crush, its all arse this arse that isnt it?

why dont you just come out and say you want man sex with a not606er
Click to expand...

Might as well run with it. None of you ****ers know who I am so I don't give a ****e.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back