Typically the BBC (aside from now running the "Watch the Penalties that Stoke should incurr from Corners" campaign) can not even perform the basics of multiplication and addition.
Our away form is Norwich (1pt) WBA (3pts) Swansea (0pts) Sunderland (0 pts) Arsenal (0 pts) Bolton (0 pts) Everton (3 pts) Wolves (3pts) Man C (0 pts) Blackburn (3 pts) & Liverpool (1 pt) - by my reckoning 14 pts from 11 games - scored a mighty 8 goals and conceded 20.
The points tally of 20 ( which we gained in our second season away from home), and in which we only scored 10 goals may explain why TP adopts the approach that he does away from home i.e. "They shall not pass".
It is churlish to say this, and we have now taken 2 points in 4 trips to Anfield, which no other Stoke Manager has managed, BUT - Liverpool are a team witha fine and great history - they are NOT a fine or great side anymore: with the exception of Stevie G, Suarez and Reina, their current side is made up of players who would nether improve or worsen the vast majority of other sides in the Prem.
If Swansea and Norwich, Sunderland, & Blackburn can get a point at Anfield, then are we not selling ourselves short, to think that we are capable of getting anything less.
Take away Stevie G and Suarez, and there is nothing remotely exciting about the current Liverpool side; and in many respects they are a more "media friendly" version of Stoke - don't score many, but concede less; the football is quite slow and relies on the individual brilliance of Stevie G and Suarez to achieve the odd bit of breathtaking skill (Suarez at our place in the League Cup).
So, while I am happy with the point, and am not faulting our effort, I still believe that a little more attacking intent away from home, will let us add to our points tally.