our home record is a disgrace no if buts maybe a utter disgrace, warnocks record in this league is the same disgraceful now i am thankful to him for getting us up but if he stays we will go down of that i have no doubt now a lot of you will disagree with me and that i except you have your own opinions which is the way it should be and this is mine the man cant cut it at this level he is out of his depth so are some of the players stupid mistakes are costing us dear and it has to be sorted before its to late
our home record
- Thread starter bowlesnumber10
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
To my mind, the major tactical blunder came at half-time when Mackie was removed; personally I thought that HH should be subbed. He has done brilliantly for us this season, but when you're playing with 10 surely you need an 'out-ball' and the ability to stretch the other team. For all is strength and heading ability, HH is NEVER going to run on to a through ball. Mackie on the other hand will chase and chase, giving the rest of the team the option of chipping the ball into the corner, or over the top in order to relieve a bit of pressure/hit on the break. Mackie moreover is no push over, he's a physical player who can hold is own in a battle.
Others are saying elsewhere that Adel should not have been taken off: agree completely, sacrifice Hill not one of our most potent threats who has the ability to keep the ball and draw in the opposition.
Totally gutted.
Others are saying elsewhere that Adel should not have been taken off: agree completely, sacrifice Hill not one of our most potent threats who has the ability to keep the ball and draw in the opposition.
Totally gutted.
To my mind, the major tactical blunder came at half-time when Mackie was removed; personally I thought that HH should be subbed. He has done brilliantly for us this season, but when you're playing with 10 surely you need an 'out-ball' and the ability to stretch the other team. For all is strength and heading ability, HH is NEVER going to run on to a through ball. Mackie on the other hand will chase and chase, giving the rest of the team the option of chipping the ball into the corner, or over the top in order to relieve a bit of pressure/hit on the break. Mackie moreover is no push over, he's a physical player who can hold is own in a battle.
Others are saying elsewhere that Adel should not have been taken off: agree completely, sacrifice Hill not one of our most potent threats who has the ability to keep the ball and draw in the opposition.
Totally gutted.
Others are saying elsewhere that Adel should not have been taken off: agree completely, sacrifice Hill not one of our most potent threats who has the ability to keep the ball and draw in the opposition.
Totally gutted.
I don't want to alarm you Bowlesy, but someone appears to have stolen every bit of punctuation from your post! ;-)
He brought on SWP to do exactly what you are describing, so I don't think you can criticise that mate. Taarabt should never have been taken off when we needed a goal. Huge blunder....again I'm afraid!!
With great respect to everyone IMHO to get rid of Warnock now would be suicide !!
Getting a new manager now, with his different style and wanting different players at this crucial time would be the worst thing possible.
Like him or not we ALL have to get behind Neil and stick by him.
Getting a new manager now, with his different style and wanting different players at this crucial time would be the worst thing possible.
Like him or not we ALL have to get behind Neil and stick by him.
I understand what you're saying and I agree with it up to a point, but I'm not sure a new manager, with a different style would necessarily be such a bad thing!!
