Suarez found guilty by FA - Fined 40,000 and suspended for 8 Matches

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
SKY said:
Stop changing the subject you sad little prick.

Why bring Hillsbourough into it????????

Cock.
Click to expand...

I'm not changing the subject. We are still debating Kenny Dalglish's integrity. Go back to my initial post, you "sad little prick".
 
Lucaaas said:
I'm not changing the subject. We are still debating Kenny Dalglish's integrity. Go back to my initial post, you "sad little prick".
Click to expand...

Lucas, you are basically saying anything Dalglish says is the truth and his opinion rules over all. It's a pretty ridiculous thing to argue back with.
 
In most professions, racially abusing someone would constitute a sacking, so hardly that bad a decision.

Suarez should consider himself lucky the police are not involved, Terry is, so he can face a much worse consequence if guilty. Also, anything the FA do in his case is irrelevant due to the police involvement.

If Terry is found guilty on this he can be banned from football grounds by the police for upto 3 years.
 
Yid Vicious said:
Would you, if the appeal is rejected?

He said that there must have been strong evidence against Suarez if he was found guilty. Since he was found guilty he'd rather him out and the sooner the better. It's simply not a question of KD regardless of any Liverpool statement.
Click to expand...

I would change my opinion. Unlike Sky, i trust the opinion of Liverpool FC more than a group of people with a clear agenda. It's not just that though - how can you merit 8 games? It's without precedant and is extreme.
 
shwan said:
don't remember exactly.. but if Chelsea, arsenal players, twice Liverpool players escape it, i don't get why FA only punished him !! worst if refs watched the actions again for Liverpool, Chelsea, arsenal ..etc. and said is ok to elbow .. why they consider that as frivolous.
the media kept showing that Rio foul, did not same for other clubs and same for rooney one which he escaped, media kept showing and talking about it for weeks, tbh if he escaped it is bcz FA can't keep only punishing UTD players over and over and let other players get away with it. and sure it is bcz he is rooney, England hope & spoiled kid !! if it was Berba he would had been get punishment as well, regardless of the club. if rooney escape it it was not only bcz he is a UTD player, but bcz he is England most talented player who is with a white skin.
all big 4 clubs get refs help, and FA have no balls.. but to claim UTD get FA help more than Liverpool is a joke.. all media are in the back of UTD, when Chelsea win 2 years ago. MOTD didn't went to show decisions that went ur way in both ur games to UTD, helping you with the title, yet when UTD win last season, the idiot Alan hansen, showed special decisions went for UTD facing smaller clubs, yet he never showed any which went against UTD, and only UTD get that honor, when other clubs win it, everyone keep quite.
there was a site called right score or right result (used by betting shops) and when counting all for and against decisions, and putting tables at the end of which club get most refs help UTD was 3rd or 4th with Arsenal, with liverpool No.1.
Click to expand...

You are going to have to remind me when Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool players have escaped punishment due to elbows by the FA. I only recall Jose Bosingwa (very surprisingly) escaping punishment after his kick on Yossi Benayoun because the assistant referee saw it.

I do remember the FA giving Emmanuel Adebayor, while at Arsenal, a four match ban and a £7500 fine for something he did not do, in the 2007 League Cup final. The referee initially thought he had hit out at Wayne Bridge, but it was actually Emmanuel Eboue who had done that. The FA tried to cover up their mistake by saying it was actually due to a punch aimed at Frank Lampard, something which both he and Lampard denied. Eboue also received a three game retrospective ban over this.

Also I really look forward to you explaining to me the decisions that went for Chelsea in our match against United two years ago. I too will not only be able to point decisions that went against us in those games, but ones that also went against us in our last game (facing United).
 
Drogs said:
Lucas, you are basically saying anything Dalglish says is the truth and his opinion rules over all. It's a pretty ridiculous thing to argue back with.
Click to expand...

No, I'm saying he wouldn't lie about something as big as this. Because he is a man of principle.

Dalglish would never tolerate racial abuse. Fact.
 
Lucaaas said:
I'm not changing the subject. We are still debating Kenny Dalglish's integrity. Go back to my initial post, you "sad little prick".
Click to expand...

And club statement's are 100% truth?? Naive.

Kenny will stick up for his player, obviously. With a possible appeal coming up he's hardly gonna blow him out the water is he?

Integrity has got **** all to do with it. If the appeal fails then we'll see his real integrity. And please explain why you mentioned what he'd done for the club and city, with regards to this case. Complete ****ing nonsense.
 
Redbrynner said:
Mate, your name is Yid Vicious.......Various members of my family would find that incredibly racist, so maybe you are not the best person to be commenting on a race Arguement.... And if you come back saying its okay, because you are one, then you are implementing cultural differences and allowances which is far more racist than calling someone a colour...

I dont know the details of the case, (as you dont) so cannot provide evidence, Can you provide evidence he was racist?
Click to expand...

<doh> Are you really this stupid?

I've not once said he's racist but he HAS been found guilty of racially abusing another player. "Innocent until proven guilty" is what we've been told all along from the Liverpool fans, well now he's guilty.

With regards to the first paragraph, I find it difficult to respond to something with no sentence structure and not a semblance of a coherent point. Can you rephrase it if you want me to respond?
 
bow4fowler* said:
I would change my opinion. Unlike Sky, i trust the opinion of Liverpool FC more than a group of people with a clear agenda. It's not just that though - how can you merit 8 games? It's without precedant and is extreme.
Click to expand...

Liverpool FC don't have an agenda? How about maintaining the value of their best player, his ability to play and as you say, Kenny's integrity.

8 games for racially abusing another player, are you suggesting their should be a more tolerant stance from the FA towards racism on the football pitch?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back