Why is it that the added time for the second half is so often much more than the added time for the first half?
Here's a question
- Thread starter yorkshirehornet
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
It could be partly because there are more second half substitutions though that only explains part of it.
Also, as the game wears on there is usually more time wasting if one team has gone ahead.
As players tire, things slow down. Also there's much more "game management" during the second half, and then there's the aforementioned substitutions.
I think the clock should be managed by an official off the pitch and visible to all
Or like in rugby could they stop the clock if the ball is out of play maybe to prevent people messing around time wasting?
Come on guys there is only one reason
If Watford are winning there is always a minimum of 5 minutes or until the opposition scores
If Watford are losing it will be 3 minutes
If Watford are winning there is always a minimum of 5 minutes or until the opposition scores
If Watford are losing it will be 3 minutes
And the 4th's board must be read aloud by all spectators in questioning tone.
The overtime last Friday was disgraceful. Only 5 minutes added yet there were 9 subs at 30 secs each and then injury time, Selvic alone was down twice for at least 2 mins each time plus other injuries, there should have been at least 9 or 10 mins. I wondered if the issue was because it was live on TV so limited added time due to their schedule.
Added time is made up of substitutions, goals, injury time & time wasting . Think that's it!
Added time is made up of substitutions, goals, injury time & time wasting . Think that's it!