Off Topic The politics thread - Starmer/Reeves/Farage etc.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Two tier yes or no?
Selling the country down the pan yes or no?
Failing UK citizens yes or no?
Was he taking back handers or taking it from behind from his billionaire backer yes or no?
Has Starmer stuck to his manifesto yes or no?
Let the conversation begin.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Don’t know
No
Poor twat is walking around as though he’s in the twilight zone.
Looking at his whiskey riddled face his chances look slim reaching spring as PM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BishopSAFC
What was frightening watching the Labour lad this morning is him admitting the two army bases will cost more a year to run than the hotels do for the same amount of illegals, but and here’s the big but, the public are happy with that as we are taking them out of the hotels<doh>
He also said there are 32,000 illegals and the barracks only hold a 1000.
Way to go my son.
Saying that the rapist has now been deported so there is only 31,999 <laugh><laugh>
Starmer has said being put up in hotels is over, they don't deserve luxury :emoticon-0148-yes:
Happy with that.
 
Or the Tory party? Mone stole £220m from all of us. Jenerick fiddling £45m for his mates or Hancock getting £28m contracts for his pub landlord? Or the grifter Farage who stole a living from the EU and now the people of Clacton?

Raynor needs to learn off the experts.

Plenty have benefited from the wfa which would have never happened because of the ‘bastard’ Labour Party.

arse lick? Are you 6 year old ffs? :)
Has any of the money been recovered yet? Looking forward to progress with this <cheers>
 
  • Like
Reactions: rooch 3
Totally agree re social care, it should be took away from party politics and a multi party team set up to sort it out.
I think a lot should be done that way, more collaborative and cross party, however there’s an issue at the moment about whether people are actually going to have public services at all. I can only speak with confidence about children’s social care and special schools but privatisation has bankrupted children’s services due to increasing cost per unit and essentially taken investment in prevention away and the owners whack it away in dividends so we aren’t even getting it back.
 
Smug in Boots,

‘I’m really confused with this subject so I thought I’d ignore everything but the core question. I keep seeing people say that he's the only one who has the solution to the ‘boat people’ but not even his biggest supporters can say what that is. As it’s the major part of his agenda I think it’s important to know.

I’d be ecstatic if we could stop this influx and only accept those who’ve been vetted and can benefit the UK …

… so, in a nutshell without endless video clips, digs at other politicians and whataboutery, can anyone explain Farage’s plans.

It’s a serious enquiry and not a trick question in any way.’
I think the concept of a rhetorical question is beyond some people's comprehension, so I will answer your question. Farage and Reform do not have a plan to combat the problem. Otherwise he would say what it is. Is that concise and succinct enough :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
I think the concept of a rhetorical question is beyond some people's comprehension, so I will answer your question. Farage and Reform do not have a plan to combat the problem. Otherwise he would say what it is. Is that concise and succinct enough :emoticon-0102-bigsm

I've seen one wild guess after another from Farage supporters mainly involving the Navy and RAF who've already said a big NO!

The various destinations, like Ascension/Gibraltar/Falklands, etc have also said NO!

One Reform claim is that they'll send people back to France who've also said NO!

But, apparently, Farage is the only one with the answer ...

... it's laughable.
 
I think the concept of a rhetorical question is beyond some people's comprehension, so I will answer your question. Farage and Reform do not have a plan to combat the problem. Otherwise he would say what it is. Is that concise and succinct enough :emoticon-0102-bigsm
I said that very very early on in the thread to be fair. I dont think it is good enough
 
It is how I would go tbh. All in. Sooner we see the back of wind turbines the better imo.
I’m not against wind turbines personally. It makes sense to best use our inclement weather to our advantage. We need to ensure the use of wind doesn’t consume too much peaty hillside which prevents flooding and also ensure we retain recreational space so got to look at counter impacts.
 
Somebody who promised to be different but is the same as the tories. Honestly no idea why, given his figures, he is not facing a challenge. We need Labour to step up, be honest, and be decisive.

I read this week. Labour donors are doing very well from government contractors in the first year of government.

As I keep saying. Tories are awful. Labour are useless. The rest dont get the scraps at the media table. We are sleepwalking into a reform government, and the most culpable will be Labour if they dont sort their performance and their leadership out. Not too late for them, but they need to act.
 
I've seen one wild guess after another from Farage supporters mainly involving the Navy and RAF who've already said a big NO!

The various destinations, like Ascension/Gibraltar/Falklands, etc have also said NO!

One Reform claim is that they'll send people back to France who've also said NO!

But, apparently, Farage is the only one with the answer ...

... it's laughable.
It wasn't a difficult question. It can be answered truthfully with one word. No.
 
I’m not against wind turbines personally. It makes sense to best use our inclement weather to our advantage. We need to ensure the use of wind doesn’t consume too much peaty hillside which prevents flooding and also ensure we retain recreational space so got to look at counter impacts.
I think they are the proverbial white elephant. And they look a mess. A blight on our landscape. The fells around Tow Law a prime example. If you must have them, go offshore, but I wouldnt like to hazard a guess as to how many you need to replicate 1 nuclear plant. Far too many folk scared of nuclear. I would sooner have one of those on my doorstep than a wind or solar farm taking up green land.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronsafc
There must be racists in the UK but no one will admit to being one.

Even those politicians, who say racist things, will deny being a racist.
I’ve said it a few times on here. People don’t have the balls to own it. We had a Ukrainian try to kill Starmer, a white Northumbrian threaten to kill Starmer and a horrible event involving a brown person and it’s ’there you go’. There have been a couple say ‘we want to retain our culture’ meaning colour and Christianity for the 4% who go but we know what’s meant and ironically the veil has started to drop politically.
 
The point about the boats is nobody can stop them. They all lie. Starmer was smash the gangs. Boris was take control of our borders. It is all utter ****e. They are all idiots. You cant stop these criminal gangs exploiting folk for money.
That’s what I’ve been saying for ages. You can reduce, manage but it takes multiple ways to do it and won’t land all the fish. It’ll get more complicated as climate change increases and there’s never been more conflict in my lifetime so more will run. The Green Party are at least honest about this. The risk is people lean to the next liar but that one will take out services and make the likes of us even worse off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blond Bombshell