1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

David Coote

Discussion in 'Liverpool' started by luvgonzo, Nov 11, 2024.

  1. johnsonsbaby

    johnsonsbaby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    22,847
    Likes Received:
    12,346
    Tbf I didn't make it clear in my first post.

    (I'm sure my phone's got a secret 'Allo 'Allo app installed. Every time I type post it comes out as pist, most as mist and just as jist - and on an on and on
     
    #301
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2025 at 6:59 PM
    Solid Air 2 likes this.
  2. Solid Air 2

    Solid Air 2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    32,886
    Likes Received:
    29,501
    <laugh>
     
    #302
  3. Libby

    Libby Derby County, we're coming for you

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    86,359
    Likes Received:
    91,963
    He's probably not the only ref to be taking cocaine, just the only one stupid enough to do it on camera.

    Suspect a fair few refs socialise together so some others would have known for sure, and bosses probably would have suspicions if his use was long term.
     
    #303
    johnsonsbaby likes this.
  4. InBiscanWeTrust

    InBiscanWeTrust Rome, London, Paris, Rome, Istanbul, Madrid
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    73,129
    Likes Received:
    27,847
    Have to wonder why pgmol aren’t doing random drug testing in their refs throughout the season as standard anyway in same way players are.
     
    #304
    luvgonzo likes this.
  5. Libby

    Libby Derby County, we're coming for you

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    86,359
    Likes Received:
    91,963
    Well I guess there's an argument for it (though I wouldn't agree personally) but it's not really a fair comparison to players?

    Players are professional athletes who in basically all sports are banned from taking drugs even outside of work. Referees aren't athletes and therefore aren't under those same restrictions.
     
    #305
    luvgonzo likes this.
  6. johnsonsbaby

    johnsonsbaby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    22,847
    Likes Received:
    12,346
    If they didn't before then they really should do now.
     
    #306
  7. InBiscanWeTrust

    InBiscanWeTrust Rome, London, Paris, Rome, Istanbul, Madrid
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    73,129
    Likes Received:
    27,847
    Surely as an organisation they will have a no drug and alcohol tolerance like majority of companies do. I’m not an athlete but get tested when sitting in an office randomly.

    These are people who are athletes and performing at top level of their profession as well as being in charge of player safety on the field. They should not be under the influence.
     
    #307
  8. ademuzzy

    ademuzzy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2015
    Messages:
    1,327
    Likes Received:
    615
    this and to add to that a little.

    whilst the performing enhancing aspect is a moot point. the integrity of it is very valid.

    given the flack refs get for decisions, then when you consider how drugs impare your decision making and judgement then that's a big problem.
     
    #308
  9. Libby

    Libby Derby County, we're coming for you

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    86,359
    Likes Received:
    91,963
    Yeah like I say there's an argument for it, I just don't think that saying because the players do is the best argument.

    Loads of companies also don't do drug testing too, an obvious example is the NHS which is probably the biggest employer in the country. I've never had a drug test whilst working an office job personally, only when operating machinery.

    Important clarification though, implementing drug testing doesn't just mean they can't work under the influence, it means they can't ever be under the influence even in their free time.

    If the player safety aspect is important do you think should it be at all professional levels or just the PL?

    I'm quite curious now as to whether other sports do it.
     
    #309
    luvgonzo likes this.
  10. Libby

    Libby Derby County, we're coming for you

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    86,359
    Likes Received:
    91,963
    This is the strongest argument for it imo, though you could argue lots of things impact judgement ie alcohol/stress.

    Nothing performance enhancing about cocaine anyway mind and physical exertion really isn't a good idea <laugh>
     
    #310
    Diego likes this.

  11. johnsonsbaby

    johnsonsbaby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    22,847
    Likes Received:
    12,346
    All players and competing athletes in British sport are compelled to undergo routine and surprise drug testing.
     
    #311
  12. Libby

    Libby Derby County, we're coming for you

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    86,359
    Likes Received:
    91,963
    Yeah I know? My point is refs aren't competing which is why I think saying "well the players get tested" is a poor argument for it.

    The impaired judgement is a much stronger argument imo.

    Do you know if any other sports randomly test officials?
     
    #312
    Zanjinho likes this.
  13. InBiscanWeTrust

    InBiscanWeTrust Rome, London, Paris, Rome, Istanbul, Madrid
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    73,129
    Likes Received:
    27,847
    Given that it’s also illegal then also see no problem in them not being able to do it in their own time. The debate about weed and legalities is a whole different debate but as of current rules then yes, no Problem in them not being under influence in their own time.

    And yes I do think all levels should be. If you’re being paid then it should be part of it. I’d be massively surprised that it’s not in their contract or they don’t already have a policy which states they can’t do it to be honest.

    Even the nhs I imagine despite not doing testing, there is still a policy that says you can’t be under influence and if they suspect someone is, they have the right to do random testing.
     
    #313
  14. Libby

    Libby Derby County, we're coming for you

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    86,359
    Likes Received:
    91,963
    Yeah I'm sure if somebody seems under the influence they can test but was just responding to your mention of most large companies do random testing by pointing out that lots won't too.

    I personally wouldn't have a problem with a ref smoking weed on his own time but alcohol or class A close to a game obviously would be an issue. I suspect you're right that it's in their contract that they can't come to work under the influence and imagine that's pretty standard everywhere.

    The problem doing it throughout the leagues is one of cost and also I suspect you'd lose many people too, particularly outside of the premier league.
     
    #314
  15. johnsonsbaby

    johnsonsbaby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    22,847
    Likes Received:
    12,346
    When you said you were curious if other sports did it I presumed you meant players in other sports. I'm guessing from this comment you meant officials of other sports. After a bit of research, the answer to that seems to be no although FIFA wanted to introduce it in 2012 but no more was heard from them after the initial announcement. The NBA and MLB in America test referees and umpires on a regular basis.
     
    #315

Share This Page