Premier League Table Game

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
all i know is i'm not going to bother checking if my score is right

Arsenal -5
Chelsea -9
LIverpool -1
Man City -3
Man Utd -10
Newcastle -7
Villa -3
Palace -4
Spurs -6
Fulham -1
Everton -3
Brighton -4
Forest -8
West Ham -5
Wolves -5
Bournemouth 0 ( you predicted they would finish 16th and they are 16th in the current table)
Sunderland -15
Brentford -1
Leeds -12
Burnley -2

Total -104
 
Simple really ... each position you predicted versus where they currently are ... so if you predicted Sunderland to finish 20th you'd currently score -18 for them ... if you'd predicted them to finish first you'd have -1 ... if second 0 ... so the player with the lowest minus will win ...


Yes, but.

The forecast I made was for the end of the season, not after the first week.
 
I'm sure fosse can find it again at the end of the season <laugh>

I didn't mind what he was doing, but everyone else did which is fair enough. I can see everyones point now it's been highlighted.

I think if he wanted to do what he's doing, he should have made it a weekly competition, with x amount of changes per week permitted, and the lowest score at the end of the season wins. Trouble is with that, do we get enough variations in the table week on week to make it anything like competitive, I doubt it.